Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula - update for the haters


CRA

Recommended Posts

27-12-1 regular season record

never missed the postseason

<insert Shula deal with it gif>

 

Is that record all thanks to Shula? Of course not.  But football is a team sport and clearly what Shula does meshes well w/ Cam AND Rivera's defensive style.  It equals wins.  So maybe we can overlook not having trick plays and be content with winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there's honestly something to be said about the value of consistency at the coordinator position.  While I think McDermott will get a head coaching gig sometime soon (probably this offseason), I find it highly unlikely that Shula will ever leave here for a promotion elsewhere.  Not because there's no chance of him ever being seen as a good coordinator, but because oh how spectacularly he failed as a HC at Alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He impressed me yesterday.  He still stubbornly stuck with running the ball into stacked boxes on 1st down way too much for my liking, but when the offense stalled, he mixed it up and got us going with some trick plays out of unconventional formations.  I'm just not sure why we have to completely stall out for him to change his approach.  One of the reasons we tend to start so slow offensively is because everyone knows what we're going to do to start out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been much better this year, but the problem is still there as in when he makes a bad call, it's a BAD call.   The only thing that is really standing out is the time on which he chooses or run or pass.  Sometimes we're stuck in a bad position on downs.

 

Also we need to play hurry up more, we see great things when we do, but don't use it enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad Shula stuck with the run game even though we were getting stuffed early on. The run game eventually opened and we ran the ball every single time on our first touchdown drive. This opened up the passing game in the second half. 

Hats off to the entire offense when things were not going our way. Early sack, no passing game and running started very slow. Shula stuck with the game plan and we played Panther football. I also thought he did a nice job making adjustments after the half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that irks me in general with Shula is that we don't have a developed short passing game. You see the way the Patriots use it to move the chains and so do the Packers, because sometimes, you can't run and you can't get the coverage you're looking for downfield for those deep throws. I'm not saying let's switch to WCO and get away from Newton's strengths, but we should be nurturing it more and more instead of settling for 3 and outs when our 2 dimensions are guarded well. We do have Newton's legs but that only becomes so effective up to a certain point and if the defense had to account for the running game, his arm strength, his legs, and his short passing precision everyone on offense will be more productive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Greg Olsenicon-article-link.gif’s game-winning touchdown: "We got the coverage I think that Mike (Shula) was looking for, that was a seam route by Greg. He was able to get into the seam and the safeties were split. He was able to get in that sweet area. I thought it was a heck of a throw."

 

lol wait Mike Shula was looking for blown coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...