Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Shula - update for the haters


CRA

Recommended Posts

27-12-1 regular season record

never missed the postseason

<insert Shula deal with it gif>

 

Is that record all thanks to Shula? Of course not.  But football is a team sport and clearly what Shula does meshes well w/ Cam AND Rivera's defensive style.  It equals wins.  So maybe we can overlook not having trick plays and be content with winning.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And there's honestly something to be said about the value of consistency at the coordinator position.  While I think McDermott will get a head coaching gig sometime soon (probably this offseason), I find it highly unlikely that Shula will ever leave here for a promotion elsewhere.  Not because there's no chance of him ever being seen as a good coordinator, but because oh how spectacularly he failed as a HC at Alabama.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He impressed me yesterday.  He still stubbornly stuck with running the ball into stacked boxes on 1st down way too much for my liking, but when the offense stalled, he mixed it up and got us going with some trick plays out of unconventional formations.  I'm just not sure why we have to completely stall out for him to change his approach.  One of the reasons we tend to start so slow offensively is because everyone knows what we're going to do to start out.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's been much better this year, but the problem is still there as in when he makes a bad call, it's a BAD call.   The only thing that is really standing out is the time on which he chooses or run or pass.  Sometimes we're stuck in a bad position on downs.

 

Also we need to play hurry up more, we see great things when we do, but don't use it enough.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am glad Shula stuck with the run game even though we were getting stuffed early on. The run game eventually opened and we ran the ball every single time on our first touchdown drive. This opened up the passing game in the second half. 

Hats off to the entire offense when things were not going our way. Early sack, no passing game and running started very slow. Shula stuck with the game plan and we played Panther football. I also thought he did a nice job making adjustments after the half. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that irks me in general with Shula is that we don't have a developed short passing game. You see the way the Patriots use it to move the chains and so do the Packers, because sometimes, you can't run and you can't get the coverage you're looking for downfield for those deep throws. I'm not saying let's switch to WCO and get away from Newton's strengths, but we should be nurturing it more and more instead of settling for 3 and outs when our 2 dimensions are guarded well. We do have Newton's legs but that only becomes so effective up to a certain point and if the defense had to account for the running game, his arm strength, his legs, and his short passing precision everyone on offense will be more productive. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On Greg Olsenicon-article-link.gif’s game-winning touchdown: "We got the coverage I think that Mike (Shula) was looking for, that was a seam route by Greg. He was able to get into the seam and the safeties were split. He was able to get in that sweet area. I thought it was a heck of a throw."

 

lol wait Mike Shula was looking for blown coverage?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...