Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

So, 61 percent of America thinks we'll be the first undefeated team to lose


nctarheel0619

Recommended Posts

Well let's see...

"The Bengals play the Browns on Thursday night, the Broncos travel to Indianapolis, the Panthers host the Packers and the Patriots host the Redskins."
 
Packers>Indy>Redskins>Browns
 
So yeah if I had to pick a team who is most likely to lose I would go with Carolina because we simply have the toughest opponent and it ain't even close...
 
Link to comment
Share on other sites

At this point, we have a serious challenge, so I do kind of agree with them. It's more probable that we lose since our opponent is much stronger than what the other teams have. 

 

Cincinnati has the Browns...

 

The Pats have the Redskins..

 

Denver has the Colts...

 

Carolina has the Packers..

 

Logic suggests our match up is the least favorable. 

 

But fug it...we're a great team right now..time to shock the world again this week. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When the first buzz began about the undefeateds, there were several more teams.

Arizona, Atlanta both lost a few weeks ago, and then the Packers last week.  So, we're not the first to lose.

But of this "final four" - yeah, we have the toughest matchup this weekend.  The vote doesn't surprise me.  I'd have voted the same way, I'm afraid. 

I DO believe we can beat Green Bay.  This team has shown me the heart, passion & skill to do it.  Not sure we WILL due to short week and injuries, but I BELIEVE in these Panthers.  We're going to continue to surprise people and get more respect as we continue to win.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...