Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

FBGP's NFL Gameplan's Wk 9 Panthers/Packers Preview

FootballCzar

By FootballCzar,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

Datawire Enthusiast

Datawire

Posted
Posted

You spent 12 minutes to explain two plays you drew up for an entire 60 min football game to draw a conclusion to a game for you and your boys to pick Green bay.

A true visionary, you are Em. At least you had the graphics right this time.

Click Bait IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
O-Ther Newbie

O-Ther

Posted
Posted

The way Em tells the Packers doing a contain rush vs. us looks fine on paper for GB if we're in a good down & distance for GB to try that, but is that really a wise decision to leave their dime defender on Thor? 

If it's 4-6 yards to go, Cam'll see 7 in the box and call the line to downblock to the strong side from Kalil down, with Oher and Silatolu sealing off their DT and LB Nick Perry, with the running back/tight end to block the remaining LB at the line or 2nd level to spring Cam. OR checking to a read/option and stressing Perry.

Too many options for GB to defend all game long. It's why we're averaging 27 points per game. Only relevant question is how much gas does our D-line have in the tank? Answer is we'll have more if Addison is good to go so Horton and Ealy can spend more time at DT. Looking forward to Shaq on the field for the blitz calls. He'll be better at rushing than Bene was vs. the Clots, or free up TD to do it.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mother Grabber Grand Master

Mother Grabber

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, UpstatePanther said:

Yes he did, but it was good analysis this time. And he's probably going to be right. I've been worried about this game since before the draft. We have the ability to win. Whether we do or not is a completely different story.

if he keeps picking us to lose, I guess he'll be right eventually.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
top dawg Grand Master

top dawg

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, O-Ther said:

The way Em tells the Packers doing a contain rush vs. us looks fine on paper for GB if we're in a good down & distance for GB to try that, but is that really a wise decision to leave their dime defender on Thor? 

If it's 4-6 yards to go, Cam'll see 7 in the box and call the line to downblock to the strong side from Kalil down, with Oher and Silatolu sealing off their DT and LB Nick Perry, with the running back/tight end to block the remaining LB at the line or 2nd level to spring Cam. OR checking to a read/option and stressing Perry.

Too many options for GB to defend all game long. It's why we're averaging 27 points per game. Only relevant question is how much gas does our D-line have in the tank? Answer is we'll have more if Addison is good to go so Horton and Ealy can spend more time at DT. Looking forward to Shaq on the field for the blitz calls. He'll be better at rushing than Bene was vs. the Clots, or free up TD to do it.

 

 

Don't know whether it was a typo or purposeful,  but referring to the Colts as the "Clots" is pretty humorous.  Perhaps Chud will help Luck stop Luck and his team from bleeding the right way. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
L-TownCat Grand Master

L-TownCat

Posted
Posted

I think I tried to watch one of these a couple years ago.

couldnt make it through and haven't tried again.

i came to ask if anyone else watches these, seems I've gotten my answer in the comments.

 

btw's OP,. If you would actually stick around and discuss in other threads instead of pimping your vids you might get a better reception.

i doubt you will picking against us but at least it wouldn't look like you're just using the huddle as a click booster.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • L-TownCat
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By L-TownCat · Posted

      So the last guy who had the job got hired by his former team directly into a role he has no direct experience in?
    • Khyber53
      Report: Panthers great Luke Kuechly being eyed for big TV job

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Hard to pass up millions for a couple of days work per week for a coaching gig in the NFL that is 60-80 hours each week during the season and a more relaxed 50 hours a week during the off season. Yeah, I'd love to see him as our DC but hard to see him giving up the cushy job there if he gets it. And he's going to be a great commentator for the network.
    • Khyber53
      2027: Sharing my thoughts on the cap without a lotta research

      By Khyber53 · Posted

      Really, I think that is where negotiations come in. If you've got a QB getting you to 10 wins but statistically he's not a great performer, then you say look you can take $22 million or you can try it on the market. Because let's face it, out there, any leadership skills that we're seeing aren't going to be on the table, it's just going to be performance and that lands him in the QB2 market, which is much, much less lucrative (although any of us would love that money).  No one is saying that Bryce will be a $50 million QB, barring something short of a miraculous jump. I'm just saying that if we are winning somehow with him at the helm, then it would be fuging stupid to dive back into the rookie pool all over again. Let's say we do hit the 10 win mark, heck, let's call it 11 and a second round in the playoffs. I think we can all say that would be a really uplifting result and one that should be doable if we have good play. What do we do then? Here's what I would offer if I were Morgan and Tepper. $25 million a year for 3 years, each year with up to $10 million in incentives for touchdowns, wins, playoff depth, being under 10 interceptions, completing a full season, passing yardage milestones, taking less than 15 sacks. Look, Bryce isn't a Ferrari, he isn't a Corvette, or a mid-level BMW. He's probably a new Toyota Sienna that will definitely get you somewhere and bring the whole team along with it, no fuss but not a lot of pizazz.  And really, it's about the destination, not about what drove you there.
×
×
  • Create New...