Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

David Newton: Rivera will not rest starters


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Agree.  If someone is healthy, 1 week of rest is more than enough (the wildcard bye).  On the other hand, just like with Peanut, I think we'll staart to see them treating minor injuries more like Major injuries and give guys substantial time out.  Make no mistake about it, if you heard Rivera talk about the 1 loss the Bears had during their superbowl run, he's butthurt by it, and he knows he can get rid of that sour taste in his mouth with an undefeated season.  Besides, an undefeated season and he goes from a guy who could have been fired 3 years ago to a guy who would be held in the same regard as the greatest head coaches of all time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion: Football players play football. I don't have a problem with game planning to win each week. Play your game and then if the score allows for it you can rotate guys in for more playing experience (which could be beneficial down the road). Jamar Nesbitt made a good point on WFNZ a few days ago, saying that because of the makeup of the roster (some players being the backup for multiple positions) it's very tough to "rest starters" and not open yourself up to depth problems if a backup is injured. You're better off rotating guys and getting more players involved rather than sitting them. Obviously, you limit CALLED runs for Cam, but other than that I think you line up and play football. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Going from the 32nd to 27th ranked QB is a huge achievement indeed.
    • I do expect the offense to fall back to earth next year if everything stays the same.  It is kinda like how the Panthers and even now the Chiefs won in the past.  Winning many close, coin flip games.  It never lasts from season to season usually. 
    • Biased is one way of putting it. The NFL is an entertainment product in the strictest legal sense. Although I might yell it out on game days, I do not believe the games are outright “rigged” meaning there is one team that is going to win no matter what happens. It’s impossible. There’s too much variance in the game that can prevent a truly rigged game from happening unless there was cooperation from many parties involved. What I am thoroughly convinced happens is that the NFL and referees “manage” the games towards certain outcomes. And that is done primarily through referee crew choice however I wouldn’t be surprised if there’s more going on behind the curtain.  The NFL uses the officials statistical tendencies to call penalties is to keep games close to drive user engagement. For example, If a crew tends to call more false start penalties, and there’s a game between a heavy pass offense where the NFL would like to manufacture a close game where it might have potential to be a blowout, then they’ll assign a crew that will slow that offense down and keep the game close.  There is an insane amount of marketing and now sports betting money that is married to the NFL economic ecosystem. To think this whole system is fair when the referee union has no outward accountability structure for poor performance is just naive. It’s closer to the WWE than outward appearances suggest, but it’s not a fully scripted outcome either. So for those who say “stop watching” if you don’t want to watch a “rigged” game, it’s an entertainment product. You can still be entertained by it, even if it’s not as fair as a truly merit based sporting event. 
×
×
  • Create New...