Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ed Werder - ESPN...lulz


CRA

Recommended Posts

Big name guy....not being very good at his job.

Werder tweeting out this morning that Carolina is trying to push Tillman to get him back...b/c they want him to matchup on Julio Jones.  LOL.  He gets paid for that. 

My 5 yr old knows that the Norman career explosion began last season with shutting down Julio Jones.  Peanut?  Seriously?  How do people get paid just to blurt out random stuff.   I mean, it takes very little effort to get some stuff right.  Ron Rivera would need to be fired on site if that was his "plan"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Could be possible depending on how we run the defense.  We could be puttting Tillman on Julio, rolling coverage to whatever side that is since they like moving Julio so much.  Putting Josh Norman on whoever else to make them non existent. Focus on stopping freeman, then mercilessly pummeling Matt Ryan into oblivion.

But meh, who knows. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually, teams have been moving their #1 WR around a lot the last few weeks against the Panthers especially moving them to the slot.  It makes sense that the Panthers would want Tillman back for this game as slot coverage has been hurt in his absence with Bene moved to #2.  Plus, most of the Panthers more exotic blitzes rely on Norman staying on his side covering 1 on 1.  Clearly the Panthers don't like Norman moving around as it limits what they can do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

22 minutes ago, Udogg said:

Could be possible depending on how we run the defense.  We could be puttting Tillman on Julio, rolling coverage to whatever side that is since they like moving Julio so much.  Putting Josh Norman on whoever else to make them non existent. Focus on stopping freeman, then mercilessly pummeling Matt Ryan into oblivion.

But meh, who knows. 

 

This is Deion Sanders' favorite coverage strategy. Put your best CB on their WR2 and double their WR1. Two is pretty much always going to be better than one in coverage even when the one is as good as Norman and that way you can better eliminate two receiving threats rather than just one.

Josh Norman would probably spontaneously combust if you told him he was covering Roddy White instead of Julio, but it's a very solid strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Bartin said:

This is Deion Sanders' favorite coverage strategy. Put your best CB on their WR2 and double their WR1. Two is pretty much always going to be better than one in coverage even when the one is as good as Norman and that way you can better eliminate two receiving threats rather than just one.

Josh Norman would probably spontaneously combust if you told him he was covering Roddy White instead of Julio, but it's a very solid strategy.

Disagree. 

Elite WRs destroy double teams and bracket coverage week in and week out in today's NFL.  Take Antonio Brown....the double/bracket/whatever doesn't take him out.  The elite CB play has. 

I don't think you need to overly force it.  Norman doesn't need to be on any player 100% of the time.  He has never done that.  MOST snaps?  Yes, most snaps Norman needs to be w/ Julio.  Which is what Ron will do.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...