Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Wade Phillips


PntherPryd

Recommended Posts

A lot was made in earlier threads last week that the Bronco's had no chance against us with the defensive scheme they displayed against the Patriots.  Speed rushing every play on the outside would be defensive suicide against any running team, much less the best pure rushing attack in the league and an extra runner in Cam.

But what makes everyone think they are going to bring the same scheme?  Wade Phillips has been a mediocre head coach but has a HOF career as a defensive coordinator.  What is he going to bring on Sunday?  How is he going to attack our offense?  

It's worth pointing out that when the game against the Patriots ended Belichick made a beeline toward Phillips and only later to Kubiak.  In the post game presser he refused to blame his OL but instead said Phillips had just done a great coaching job.  Nothing revolutionary, just good coaching.

How will Phillips design his SB defense?  Will he have a spy?  Will he test Cam's arm?  Or will he bring pressure like he did last week?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wade is one of the best defensive minds in the NFL, and in addition to that, runs a 34.  Not only is the 34 very confusing to almost all QB's, he actually has the players to make it tick.

I think, maybe, the best course of action will be a downhill running attack right up the gut on them.  Make them commit an extra defender to the run, as those corners can cover almost everyone.  I don't think that they can play as much man on D though, as they can't afford a spy, and if the corners turn their backs to Cam, he will have a field day running.

Not so sure they tee off against us either, may decide to let Cam beat them with his arm, and hope that the stage is too big for us.

The real answer...no one knows what the hell Wade will do, but he will have that team prepared for whatever they believe can limit Cam and our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, cookinbrak said:

Bring pressure around the ends. Cam will have 200 yds and 5 rushing TDs.

that's my point, Phillips isn't stupid.

Cam can be extremely accurate but has episodes of 2-3 throws a game where he can still throw high.  I think the bronco's will have a LB spy and play contain on the outside for most of the game, trusting their secondary.

So, if true, our running game becomes the critical factor.  Can we keep the sticks moving?  Will we try to strike early or will Shula be patient and attack the interior of that defense?

This team has jumped in front of so many teams, I wonder how they will react to that offensive strategy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Phillips is good but our offense dictates what happens because it's multifaceted. At this point Cam has seen most blitz packages and has even played a Phillips coached defense. He knows we want to run the ball just like everyone else but can he stop it. I suggest spy cam and double Olsen. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Wade has to do two things.

1)Load up to stop the run. (Not easy with a base 3-4)

2)Somehow keep Olsen covered. (Just not easy period)

Now here is the conundrum, you cant do both of these things at the same time so the early downs will be to our advantage.  Get ahead of the sticks and the Denver game plan goes out the window.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, yasuhara2241 said:

Out of curiosity how have we done against Wade Phillip defenses in the past? I know he was with Houston before Denver and then Dallas but I don't know how we have faired against his coached teams.

Played him in 2011, but Cam was a youngster, Smith and Shockey caught TD passes, and DWill ran for 1.

Held Cam to 149 passing yards.

The D he runs now, and our offense/Cam are much better now though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The real chess match is going to be in play calls.  If they blitz, we can get some guys open, or run away from the blitzes.  If they cover, we can run against that.  This will be our biggest test, appropriately.

I hope that Shula has some magic cooked up prior to this as well.  It's going to be interesting to see how we attack their defense just as how they attack our offense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, thefuzz said:

Played him in 2011, but Cam was a youngster, Smith and Shockey caught TD passes, and DWill ran for 1.

Held Cam to 149 passing yards.

The D he runs now, and our offense/Cam are much better now though.

Absolutely I know we are light years ahead of the last time I was just curious. I think there is so much difference between those two teams.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PntherPryd said:

A lot was made in earlier threads last week that the Bronco's had no chance against us with the defensive scheme they displayed against the Patriots.  Speed rushing every play on the outside would be defensive suicide against any running team, much less the best pure rushing attack in the league and an extra runner in Cam.

But what makes everyone think they are going to bring the same scheme?  Wade Phillips has been a mediocre head coach but has a HOF career as a defensive coordinator.  What is he going to bring on Sunday?  How is he going to attack our offense?  

It's worth pointing out that when the game against the Patriots ended Belichick made a beeline toward Phillips and only later to Kubiak.  In the post game presser he refused to blame his OL but instead said Phillips had just done a great coaching job.  Nothing revolutionary, just good coaching.

How will Phillips design his SB defense?  Will he have a spy?  Will he test Cam's arm?  Or will he bring pressure like he did last week?

 

They played 3 games against Top 10 rushing offenses....and gave up nearly 150 yards a game to each of them.  That is why.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I've explained this in more detail before. Briefly, there's a process to quickly evaluate a QB. Also, there's a type of QB that excels at a higher rate than others at the pro level. After that, it's about keeping the QBs flowing through the system. 1st round QBs are not superior, they just get more reps and game time. You can find just as many competitive QBs that are 3rd day or undrafted if you give them the same reps and game time. Now, to dive deeper for fun. To understand this further, there are rare 1st round QB exceptions, but they must come with a pro pedigree and proven success in college. There's only 1 to 3 of these QBs every decade (John Elway 1983, Peyton Manning 1998, Eli Manning 2004, Andrew Luck 2012, Jared Goff 2016, Patrick Mahomes 2017, and Joe Burrow 2020. That's 1 of every 20 1st round QBs (5% of historical 1st round QBs in modern draft era). When you look at 1st rd QB success, eliminate these rare ones from your samples because they are trained to be championship QBs. 100% of them have taken their team to a championship. Also, the Bill Walsh tree knows the formula for building an offense and finding a QB QUICKLY. The question is why haven't others figured it out & continue to waste draft capital on QBs? Based on my QB evaluation system, here's the QBs I had slotted for the Panthers over the past 10 drafts. Patrick Mahomes, Brad Kaaya, Cooper Rush, Lamar Jackson, Brett Rypien, Tyler Huntley, Jalen Hurts, Shane Buechele, Desmond Ridder, Brock Purdy, Aqeel Glass, Jack Coan, Aidan O'Connell, Tanner McKee, Spencer Rattler, Devin Leary, Sam Hartman, Quinn Ewers. The ones in bold were the ones that rated the highest for pro championship qualities (probable franchise QBs). Obviously,  we didn't need them all, but it's about flow of pro championship qualities shown in college and not the most physically gifted. Also, there are a few QBs every decade who have the qualities, but never get a chance. If you're talent evaluation/QB system is good enough, you can go get 2 to 3 of them tomorrow to show what they can do when their name is called. I expect 1 of every 6 QBs to be worthy of being a franchise QB. There's strict rules to the depth chart qualifications, rotation, minimum KPIs and cuts/trades for me. Panthers have had Collins, Beuerlein, Weinke, Delhomme, Clausen, Newton, Bridgewater, Darnold, and Young. If you include Lewis, Peete, Allen and Mayfield, the Panthers have had 3 of 13 championship level franchise QBs. 1 of 5 (1 of 6 if you don't count Collins). It's the same for every franchise. The difference is a certain coaching tree knows how to move them through quicker than all the others while building defense with the most valuable draft picks. For Walsh, Montana(3rd rd) was his 3rd QB and Young(trade) was his 12th (9 yrs). He had a process allowing him to move through them rapidly. For Holmgren, Favre(trade) was his 4th QB and Hasselbeck(6th rd/trade) was his 15th QB (10 yrs). Neither of them settled on or tried to solve the problems of their 1st QB. For Andy Reid, McNabb(1st rd) was his 2nd QB and Mahomes(1st rd) was his 15th QB (19yrs). For John Harbaugh, Flacco(1st rd) was his 1st and Jackson(1st rd) was his 8th (11 yrs). For Sean McVay, Goff(1st rd) was his 1st and Stafford(trade) was his 5th (5yrs). Reid was the slow and stubborn one who wouldn't move on from his QB & had to wait nearly 2 decades to grab a QB that is the rare exception. I present this to show how 1st round picks are wasted on QBs, and it's the process fitting the QB to the system that generates success. Championship leader qualities and a process to move through QBs for a single coach's offense until you find a winner is the formula. The ages of these QBs from the Walsh tree when they won their first SB: Montana(25), Young(33), Favre(27), Mahomes(24), Flacco(27), and Stafford (33). Mahomes is the only sports pedigree QB exception on this list. QBs selected in the top 20 picks that weren't a pedigree QB were discarded by the team that drafted them. It will continue to be the same for the QB position as the dynamics of an offense from coach to field to team to clutch moments are not going to change. The combines/draft is just a media show that will only highlight the rare pedigree exceptions at QB for the NFL. You can line up ANY 12 QBs demonstrating success in college with the pro championship level qualities right now & you'll find a couple franchise QBs. Overrated arm strength & athleticism mean absolutely nothing for success at the pro level (that's a bonus). If they had enough of the tangibles to consistently succeed in college, it will translate to the pros. Currently, the Panthers are on QB #1 being shoved into Canales' system. Hooker is Canales' 4th QB (5th if you count Bryce Perkins). The Panthers only need to get Young out of the way and start giving these QBs a shot. If a GM can't fit a QB with the offensive coach in 6 QBs, then it's time to move to a new GM. For Canales' system, I'd go with Cooper Rush(trade), Tyler Huntley(available/ps), Desmond Ridder(available), Jack Coan(available), Aqeel Glass(available), Tanner McKee(trade), Sam Hartman(available/ps), Devin Leary(available), Hendon Hooker(on roster), Clayton Tune(available/ps), Chris Oladokun(available/ps), DJ Uiagalelei(available/ps) and Shane Buechele(available/ps). No particular order. This just demonstrates the winning process at QB to build a winning team. 7 of these QBs have been chosen by SB winning coaches. The point is to line them up and have one head coach with one offensive system move through them as quickly as possible until one of them holds on to the starting position with success and claims the franchise QB title. I expect the top 20 1st round picks for a franchise QB is the only way crowd to attack this and the Bill Walsh tree. Likely going to tell you that 6th round & later QBs as well as the Walsh tree are the sole outliers. We can count more 6th round and later championship QBs(13) than we can the 1st round pedigree QBs(7). As for the other 47 SB QBs, only 15 QBs have been drafted in the top 20 and led their first team to the SB. The best return is the pedigree 1st round QB, but this is rare. As for top 20 pick QBs that aren't pedigree, you're better off running 6th round and later QBs through the offensive system as quick as possible while spending that top 20 1st round pick on core defense or the rare dual threat skill position player. I don't expect the typical media driven fan to agree. I know SB winning coaches keep signing my college QB targets.
    • Best QB I've seen this year so far, with all due respect to Allen and Jackson.
    • What’s with the chargers run game?  They were good last year 
×
×
  • Create New...