Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Some Insight Into the Charles Johnson re-Signing


X-Clown on 1

Recommended Posts

Released earlier today, via Cat Scratch Reader:

http://www.derp/2016/4/14/11429886/charles-johnson-nearly-fired-agent-over-panthers-return

Couple tidbits that stuck out to me:

1)  "He was just shocked when I left that money on the table. Like I told you, I signed this one year deal to bet on myself... why wouldn't I want to sign with somebody that I feel comfortable with, that has done everything for me? Now I can go out, give it my all, don't have to worry about money, don't worry about nothing. Just go out and play ball without worrying about that extra stuff. They can't call me "big money" anymore."

I kind of read this a few ways.  I see Charles with a reason and motivation to take a lower deal, betting on himself and ready to earn a big deal.  But I also saw this as Charles recognizing (subconsciously at least) that he's not living up to the expectations of a big contract.  But, instead of raising his level to match the pay, he seems he's lowered his pay to match his level.  

2)  "Even when I was signing back, Mr. Gettleman said, you know, you might not have a chance to start. I never even thought about that, because I'm going to compete regardless."

I like this from DG, because as far as production goes, I'm not sure Charles is the best option for us.  He's been a team captain, a veteran model for the younger guys, and has all the chemistry the team needs both on the field and in the locker room.  But I'm curious, who do you see lining up as the "other" DE besides Ealy? Is it a draft prospect, another FA the added later, or possibly someone already on the roster?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I see Ealy and Johnson playing LDE--so the comment was honesty.  I expect the other side to feature Addison and----if we don't draft anyone,  Delaire and Miley.   Cox, in my opinion, will compete for a job at LDE, but will probaby be on the PS for another year.

All this is ASSUMING they think they have something special on the farm.  If not, we HAVE to draft a RDE type---Dodd comes to mind.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, X-Clown on 1 said:

Released earlier today, via Cat Scratch Reader:

http://www.derp/2016/4/14/11429886/charles-johnson-nearly-fired-agent-over-panthers-return

Couple tidbits that stuck out to me:

1)  "He was just shocked when I left that money on the table. Like I told you, I signed this one year deal to bet on myself... why wouldn't I want to sign with somebody that I feel comfortable with, that has done everything for me? Now I can go out, give it my all, don't have to worry about money, don't worry about nothing. Just go out and play ball without worrying about that extra stuff. They can't call me "big money" anymore."

I kind of read this a few ways.  I see Charles with a reason and motivation to take a lower deal, betting on himself and ready to earn a big deal.  But I also saw this as Charles recognizing (subconsciously at least) that he's not living up to the expectations of a big contract.  But, instead of raising his level to match the pay, he seems he's lowered his pay to match his level.  

 

 

CJ mentioned this in his CharlotteVibe interview... 

I don't think people realize he's just a humble guy and doesn't want to be called big money.  

No need to over think it.   He's never liked the name. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think that was just Dave's way of telling him not to rest on his laurels just because he's back, and especially because he's back on a cheaper deal.  Of course CJ as of now is going to be the penciled in starter, but it doesn't mean it's just automatically his if someone ends up looking like a better option throughout camp and early season.

But really, as long as CJ is fully healthy and motivated... lol I seriously doubt he's going to be hurting for any playing time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think DG was level setting expectations for CJ before he signed.  I think he was letting him know that nothing is guaranteed and if wanted guarantees, he should go somewhere else.  CJ did not have a good 2015....it was average at best and if the Panthers get the 'average at best CJ' in 2016, I don't think he starts.  There is a lot of time before the seasons starts, and many more roster moves will occur.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Telling him he might not be a starter is pretty interesting.

I actually love it.

Smarter vets know when they are getting lip service.  DG was being brutally honest with him, and CJ respected it, and signed.

He told Nicks that he would have been better to sign elsewhere a couple years ago, love it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...