Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You're Worried....Have You Really Looked at How Deep the Depth Is...?


SetfreexX

Recommended Posts

Below is a rough chart of our defensive back situation pre/post draft, when you think about other positions on the roster and what we’ve done over the last several drafts since Gettleman’s arrival you begin to see the BIGGER picture. That bigger picture is ‘Quality Depth’, since Gettleman’s arrival we have solidified position group after position group.

 

Gettleman’s 1st year DL was a weakness, double dip at DT (resulting in TWO pro-bowl players), 2nd year WR exodus takes place, (KB, Funch, Brown and Ginn in free agency) Benjamin showed he was a pro-bowl caliber player, Funchess proved he will become a talent that could potentially rival Benjamin’s, Ginn is a PLAYMAKER in our system, and Brown has gotten better and better. 3rd year offensive line is the concern, the Bell/Chandler experiment fails insert Oher (free agency), Mike Remmers via waivers iirc, Norwell (UDFA), Turner & Williams via draft and here we are again with one of the better lines in the league, Turner is a pro-bowl talent, Williams many on the staff alluded to being able to start at RT, and performed well in the pre-season at LT, and Norwell has done nothing but impress.

 

 

 

Now in the 4th year we rescind the tag on Norman, and Gettleman looks to solidify one of the only position groups with no depth, defensive back, and to do so we bring in DB’s with size to matchup with Evans, Julio, and now this rookie in new Orleans. We draft a back-up nickel in Sanchez as Boykin is on a 1 year deal and may play himself into a contract higher than what we may be willing to match, not only that we add to the defensive line depth to 1) add insurance in case of injury, 2) in case we lose KK, or Syar (I think we’ll retain both), 3) consistent pass rush helps the DB’s, 4) DT’s that can push the pocket prevent QB’s from stepping up to avid the edge rush allowing  us to maintain the pressure from four allowing the back seven to swarm.

 

It really is amazing to me after a 12-4, 7-8-1, & 15-1 Superbowl appearance seasons and THREE STRAIGHT DIVISION TITLES (Never Before Done in the NFC South) that amateur arm chair scouts are doubting the GM that has put together a roster that has allowed the above to take place. The man is a scout by trade, and not only do we boast one of the best rosters in the NFL, we have the CAP to actually sustain it. That to me at least seems to be what’s lost in the wake and aftermath of the draft by many fans….

 

http://www.panthers.com/team/roster.html

2016 DB Depth (Pre-Draft)

 

Benwikere - 6'

 

Boykin - 5'10

 

McClain - 5'9

 

Young - 6'1

 

Williams -6'1

 

 

 

2016 DB Depth (Post-Draft)

 

 

Benwikere

 

Boykin

 

McClain

 

Young

 

Williams

 

Bradberry - 6'1

 

Worley - 6'1

 

Sanchez - 5'11

 

When you look at just the difference in the above chart not only did we got bigger, more physical, we added more speed as well (Bradberry & Sanchez), and guys who are KNOWN BALLHAWKS a theme that is consistent with our defensive philosophies, so no it wasn’t a sexy draft, it wasn’t a splashy draft, but it was a well thought out, solidify our future draft, and gentleman creating a roster to SUSTAIN success is the GMs job, With Rivera, McDermott, and Wilks coaching up the defense I look for us to continue to have one of the best defenses over the next SEVERAL years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Main thing here is that size was added.  Thats going to be key in matchups.

Our defense is all about keeping the play infront of you and reacting quickly and making the play.  We are not asking DBs to chase recivers from one end of the feild to the other.  Big guys that can tackle are imperative.  Josh was great at this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When did  "sexy" become some broad-brush badge of honor?

 

We took three turnover oriented corners-perimeter players-at a position of dire need, along with a supposed pass catching tight end 

 

It doesn't get anymore "sexy" than that if the definition put forth by the "ur just a madden player brah" contingent over the years here is to be believed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So is "sexy" just some all encompassing generalization of everything the Panthers don't do? I'm confused now. Is every team in the league just trying to be "sexy" instead of us?

 

Odd coincidence that we all just so happened to be fans of that one singular team who does it "right."

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Growl said:

So is "sexy" just some all encompassing generalization of everything the Panthers don't do? I'm confused now. Is every team in the league just trying to be "sexy" instead of us?

 

Odd coincidence that we all just so happened to be fans of that one singular team who does it "right."

 

I think sexy = highly talked about prospects on espn or nfl network.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, motocross_cat said:

I think sexy = highly talked about prospects on espn or nfl network.

 

So really large, trenches players like Laremy Tunsil  are sexy? But that goes against everything this board has ever taught me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Growl said:

So really large, trenches players like Laremy Tunsil  are sexy? But that goes against everything this board has ever taught me.

You must have never heard Mayock get all excited talking about bubble butts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
    • Won’t stop until people stop buying overpriced poo.
×
×
  • Create New...