Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When you aren't good enough for Atlanta's defense....


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

58 minutes ago, 15 said:

Their #1 corner is better than ours, everything else is a push or worse.

Atlanta has a good secondary group.  Alford was top 5 along with sherman and revis for lowest completion % when targeted.  It's not a push or worse.  That's inaccurate.  We don't know what we have yet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 pages because we cut a guy who never played a down as a Panther.  All these couch GMs throwing Gettleman under the bus and declaring Boykin the second coming of Deion when 4 teams have let him go in the last year and he can't even make the Falcons 90 man squad.  So many here like to bitch just to bitch.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Growl said:

Number of people have said Boykin is pretty determined to play on the outside which is where his division with teams comes from. He could've done that here for a year.

I for one had said that as well. However, considering I've read some sources about him being burned on the outside in college and a few pro games, his specialty is nb. We got a butt load of rookies that need reps. We're in a decent position right now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, 15 said:

meh I think alford is overrated. bene was ranked as a top corner his first year too. How about big bad charles godfrey and their future bust of a rookie playing safety? 

I apologize i meant corner group not the entire secondary.  Godfrey is yucky..  YUCKY

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, I'm starved for contention. If you can't see that and keep wanting to turn things like this back around on T-Mac, then you're just either being purposefully obtuse, or is a fan who is happy having 5-6 win seasons just because we're so used to the 3-4 win seasons and you like "just being better"
    • Chiefs had zero penalties last night
    • You mean the guy who took over a franchise that hadn't had a losing season in the previous 4 seasons... who proceeded to get his team into the playoffs in 3 of his first 4 seasons, only to win 2 games in said playoffs, to then go on to having a 54-74 career record and never won another playoff game after those first two? Who then after being fired from that job, took over a team that was 30-18 in the 3 seasons before he got the job, got into the playoffs that first season, lost their first postseasons game, and then went on to have a 6-26 record over the next 2 seasons? You're literally proving my point by bringing up someone who's claim to fame is that quote. If you just play to win the game, you're never going to be a successful franchise.  You need to play to win the game while ALSO working to make your players better.  Having the former without the latter is a picture perfect recipe to become a stagnant franchise. That's how you work towards being a winning franchise who can contend in the postseason.  And sure, having a stagnant franchise that makes the playoffs every other season is better than what we currently are, but that's not what I strive for with our Panthers, I want to actually contend for championships in my lifetime.
×
×
  • Create New...