Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Math just got important!


Stumpy

Recommended Posts

5520131856170.jpg

Now, if you really want to get to the nitty gritty, the depth of the crust is not given for either slice. But Chicago pizzas can suck a dick, and in terms of value in a pizza; without knowing the composition, the crust is essentially worthless. It is also impossible to determine either the viscosity of the cheese, or the thickness of the pepperoni.

We can, however, estimate a diameter of 1.5 inches per sliced sausage. Which works out to an area of 1.77". With ~7.1 slices on specimen A, we get 1.77 × 7.1 = 12.57 square inches of pepperoni. On specimen B, ~8.3 pepperonis comes out to 14.69 inches of delicious cured meat.

Moving onto the cheese, we have to assume a standard crust handle width of 0.75 inches. This gives us a radius of 5.25, for an area of 27.56(pi)÷6 or 14.42 square inches of cheese on A. With B having a radius of 6.25, we get 15.33 square inches of gooey bovine lifeforce.

Here is where it gets tricky. Some would argue to include the sauce as a topping, but as a sauce minimalist (again, fug deep dish) I disagree. Seeing as most pizzerias don't charge for extra sauce, this view has merit. Also, assigning a value ratio between the meat and cheese on a pizza is dangerous territory: a quick survey among your friends would quickly devolve into primal grunts and war paint. To avoid this landmine, we will simply rely on standard pizza place pricing practices, whereby extra cheese costs the same as extra pepperoni.

Finally, adding together the 12.57 inches of pepperoni and the 14.42 inches of cheese, we get $1.50÷26.99" for a price of 5.56 cents per square inch for specimen A. With a topping total of 30.02" and a price of $1.70, specimen B works out to 5.66 cents/inch. Clearly, Speciman A is the better option, unless one of them its stuffed crust, then all bets are off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Stumpy said:

5520131856170.jpg

Now, if you really want to get to the nitty gritty, the depth of the crust is not given for either slice. But Chicago pizzas can suck a dick, and in terms of value in a pizza; without knowing the composition, the crust is essentially worthless. It is also impossible to determine either the viscosity of the cheese, or the thickness of the pepperoni.

We can, however, estimate a diameter of 1.5 inches per sliced sausage. Which works out to an area of 1.77". With ~7.1 slices on specimen A, we get 1.77 × 7.1 = 12.57 square inches of pepperoni. On specimen B, ~8.3 pepperonis comes out to 14.69 inches of delicious cured meat.

Moving onto the cheese, we have to assume a standard crust handle width of 0.75 inches. This gives us a radius of 5.25, for an area of 27.56(pi)÷6 or 14.42 square inches of cheese on A. With B having a radius of 6.25, we get 15.33 square inches of gooey bovine lifeforce.

Here is where it gets tricky. Some would argue to include the sauce as a topping, but as a sauce minimalist (again, fug deep dish) I disagree. Seeing as most pizzerias don't charge for extra sauce, this view has merit. Also, assigning a value ratio between the meat and cheese on a pizza is dangerous territory: a quick survey among your friends would quickly devolve into primal grunts and war paint. To avoid this landmine, we will simply rely on standard pizza place pricing practices, whereby extra cheese costs the same as extra pepperoni.

Finally, adding together the 12.57 inches of pepperoni and the 14.42 inches of cheese, we get $1.50÷26.99" for a price of 5.56 cents per square inch for specimen A. With a topping total of 30.02" and a price of $1.70, specimen B works out to 5.66 cents/inch. Clearly, Speciman A is the better option, unless one of them its stuffed crust, then all bets are off.

kGTe4XA.gif

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Crust, cheese, pepperoni, etc isn't specified so I assume it is a constant quality, thickness, etc between the two and you are just trying to maximize amount of pizza per dollar spent.

So you need to calculate the area of each slice and do a ratio of each area to their respective price. Using  area=((n degrees)/360))*pi*r^2, I get areas of approx. 18.87 and 19.26 respectively. Option B is bigger. Option B is also more costly.Doing a ratio with price, I get 12.58 sq inch per dollar for option A and 11.33 sq inch per dollar for option B. So option A is the better deal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The reset worked with proton.me.. wouldn’t work with my Gmail, Yahoo or Verizon email accounts 
    • Wish they started at 5:30 or 6 at the latest so I can watch it. I have to be in bed by start time.
    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
×
×
  • Create New...