Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Cam Newton: My job is not to lobby for my health


top dawg

Recommended Posts

I get the fact that Cam wants to win football games first and foremost, and I get the fact that Cam apparently has resolved himself to take a politically correct, overly cautious stance as it pertains to his professionalism, but Cam is just being too vanilla for my taste regarding the refs and dirty ponies.

 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000702511/article/cam-newton-my-job-is-not-to-lobby-for-my-health

I understand his focus on getting wins and not getting bogged down by yesterday's news, but from where I am sitting, Cam needs to understand that it is his job to lobby for his health. Ultimately that is his responsibility which may very well speak to whether the Panthers win or lose (which is also his responsibility).  I would go so far to say that as it is a team sport, it would have been nice if the Panthers, from J-Rich on down, would have taken it upon themselves to lobby for Cam's health as well.  I am just sorely disappointed in the responses or lack thereof regarding the safety and protection of the organization's franchise QB.  

Et tu, Cam?

This Mr. Nicey Nicey vibe emanating from the Panthers regarding this situation is really kind of nauseating at this point.  But, I guess, it is what it is. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, top dawg said:

I get the fact that Cam wants to win football games first and foremost, and I get the fact that Cam apparently has resolved himself to take a politically correct, overly cautious stance as it pertains to his professionalism, but Cam is just being too vanilla for my taste regarding the refs and dirty ponies.

 http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap3000000702511/article/cam-newton-my-job-is-not-to-lobby-for-my-health

I understand his focus on getting wins and not getting bogged down by yesterday's news, but from where I am sitting, Cam needs to understand that it is his job to lobby for his health. Ultimately that is his responsibility which may very well speak to whether the Panthers win or lose (which is also his responsibility).  I would go so far to say that as it is a team sport, it would have been nice if the Panthers, from J-Rich on down, would have taken it upon themselves to lobby for Cam's health as well.  I am just sorely disappointed in the responses or lack thereof regarding the safety and protection of the organization's franchise QB.  

Et tu, Cam?

This Mr. Nicey Nicey vibe emanating from the Panthers regarding this situation is really kind of nauseating at this point.  But, I guess, it is what it is. 

John Fox is that you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

Lol.....nothin this guy says will ever be good enough. He truly can't win. 

I accepted that last year. It's sad. The guy is a saint compared to most NFL players and he still gets poo'd on. Like I said in another thread, Antonio Brown twerked in the end zone and the media loved it. Cam dabs and supermans and he is torn down. What a shame. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's being smart.  Of course we all want him to stand up for himself, but if he takes a 180 now then he loses the support he has.  The majority of the public (surprisingly) already has his back on this issue. If it happens again there will be a bigger uproar.  Hopefully, only one more incident (on any quarterback) will actually make the league do something. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The bottom line is we saw long stretches this season where T-Mac wasn't even targeted.  He had games where he went an entire half without seeing a pass thrown his way, and it lead to a bunch of games with 5 or less targets.  If he's healthy and we're not up a stupid amount and only running the ball, I can't see him having more than a game or two next year with 5 or less targets. We were also only 22nd this year in pass attempts, and that was with a rookie #1 and no legitimate 2nd option for half the season.  And even then, we were only 46 pass attempts above 31st place. If we go into next season with T-Mac improved in his 2nd season and a healthy Coker for 17 games, there is absolutely no reason for us to not throw it more.  That right away increases both of their target totals without sacrificing any targets from each other or other players, add in them taking targets from the TEs and RBs on top of that, and your argument just doesn't hold water anymore. You can't look at targets/yards in a vacuum and think next year Coker just takes some from T-Mac.  You have to look at the team as a whole and our situations this year and then project what will happen next year. If he's healthy for 17 games, I'd bet my life savings that T-Mac sees increases across the board, targets/catches/yards/TDs.   Just as Coker will also see career highs in all categories, it's not one vs the other, it's shifting offensive strategy given our personnel, which next year will be much better for our passing game (QB issues aside).
    • C'mon now.... First, you can't switch up your argument once someone points out a major flaw in your point. You're saying we shouldn't expect a big increase in targets/yards for T-Mac, but then shift to talking about averages with Chase when I point out the significant leap he took there once you factor in his missing games.  He saw an increase in targets in 5 less games, averages aside, he saw a significant increase in targets in his 2nd season, what he then did with those targets is actually irrelevant in this discussion. Puka seeing no increase is pointless, as he saw such an absurd amount of targets for a rookie, it's near impossible to see an increase. But the real issue in this post is that you think I'm proving your point by showing how Waddle had to share targets with Hill. Tyreek Hill was a 1st team All Pro who was 2nd in the NFL in yards that season. If you think Jaylen Waddle sharing targets with a 1st team All Pro and a future HOFer is even remotely in the same category as T-Mac needing to share targets with Coker... then you are certifiably insane, lol. If anything, you could make the argument that Coker is to Waddle as T-Mac is to Hill in that discussion (which would then lead to a serious increase in targets/yards for T-Mac).  But even that is insane, as neither T-Mac or Coker will be as good as Hill and Waddle respectively that season.  I love both of their potential, but c'mon now, T-Mac isn't getting 119 catches for 1,700 yards and Coker isn't getting 117 for 1,350 next season.
×
×
  • Create New...