Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Get rid of Tre Boston


t96

Get rid of Tre Boston?  

84 members have voted

  1. 1. Get rid of Tre Boston?

    • Yes, cut him
    • No, keep him but bench his ass
    • No, he's a beast and should be our starter


Recommended Posts

I agree that Boston shouldn't be starting out there, but he's a good back up. Haha at cutting him because of his views. Incredibly selfish on your end...he's allowed to take a stand. Also, if you cut him now, I'd guarenteed many players would give the organization the side eye and there'd be a few disgruntled players. I'd imagine there's a few in that locker room who feels like Tre. Cut him now, and this team spirals out of control. Cutting him now would be one of the worst moves you could make, and bring even more pressure to the team. Media would have a field day with this. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, truthjuice said:

He kneeled or something? He said he's gonna protest? He's just not s starting player. He's nice for a series or two. 

Didn't do anything today, but he said he and a few others got something planned for next week. Said he's not going to let two weeks pass without doing something. I guess his conscious won't allow it. 

So, off top, there's others who feels like him. You cut him, then you piss those guys off, and no telling who he's got participating with him. Trai Turner seems like that kind of guy. I called Boston being the person on our team to do something. I see it in Turner as well.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I mean, it's easy to say, "Morgan was Fitterer's right hand man, so he agreed with all the mistakes Fitterer made." Life and managerial structures don't necessarily work that way. GMs aren't perfect, and there are going to be hits and misses most every draft. Most would say that if you can get a couple of starters in a draft that you're doing pretty good. Even if X busts, there are still people in that draft, and an undrafted free agent, that look promising. JT looked pretty good yesterday. Calculate in the 2025 draft, which I think is fair, and I'm not going to complain. Where I think Dan has not gotten it right is overpaying a couple of free agents. and, sorry, I don't accept the "Panthers tax" argument because there is modest overpaying and gross overpaying.  I'm very much more critical of Dave Canales. He has to develop the talent that he is given. He also is responsible for his staff and personnel decision is on game days. I'm glad that he saw fit to get JT more involved yesterday. He gets zero credit for Hunter Renfrow, as should've never fired him in the first place, only to rehire him due to injury.  But Dan, I'd give another couple of years. 
    • Pass rushers are spot that outside of the drafts elite typically take 2-3 to develope and bro is tripping in 2 games... this team SUCKS no need to be so dramatic 
    • Learn to laugh more. The inevitable is on its way and if that was a high point for those people the there is lots more laughter ahead. 
×
×
  • Create New...