Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Mike Tolbert pays $3,900 bill in change


CRA

Recommended Posts

https://www.google.com/amp/www.sbnation.com/platform/amp/lookit/2016/9/28/13089302/mike-tolbert-panthers-nfl-car-shop-revenge-paid-in-coins?client=safari

 

saw this on ESPN

Tolbert has a lot to learn....if you are going to give the middle finger to someone by paying a large bill in annoying change you have to take the coins out of the boxes and out of the nice pretty rolls. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's two sides to every story and the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. Impossible to say who's at fault here given the info in the article. Both sides honestly sound plausible at face value. 

it might be that he went in there leaning on them to comp the work, that pissed them off, and then they kept coincidentally having "setbacks" and raising the estimate.

both sides would technically be telling the truth if that was the case

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's two sides to every story and the truth is usually somewhere in the middle. Impossible to say who's at fault here given the info in the article. Both sides honestly sound plausible at face value. 

Totally agree.

I merely took enjoyment out of the fact Tolbert totally screwed up his "revenge". Everything was rolled and in neat bank boxes. Kinda defeats the purpose because it was all neatly packaged to carry right back to the bank.

gotta use loose change, Mike.  You get a fail there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SZ James (banned) said:

why should I be outraged at this?

Shouldn't be.  Posted merely because it is a Panther making the big news outlets. 

Emphasis in post is more on his poor execution and lesson to be learned if someone ever opts to get on that level. Not picking a side in the dispute because we don't know the truth.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, CRA said:

Totally agree.

I merely took enjoyment out of the fact Tolbert totally screwed up his "revenge". Everything was rolled and in neat bank boxes. Kinda defeats the purpose because it was all nearly packaged to carry right back to the bank.

gotta use loose change, Mike.  You get a fail there.

To be fair I bet that was a bitch to carry.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, PandaPancake said:

Dude. You gotta unroll those coins. Put a layer in a five gallon bucket, thin layer of dirt, another layer of coins, and so forth. Keeps them from putting it in the coin counter at the bank.

 

fuging rookie

"Ok sir, you can have your car back when we get this taken care of down at the bank. Should just be 2-4 weeks."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Would Morgan or Beason have been HOFers' if injuries hadn't derailed their careers?  I was not a close watcher of the game when Morgan was in his prime but I thought Beason had a few seasons at close to Lukes' level of play.
    • Franchise QBs feast when things are rolling and the tide that raises boats when things are going sideways.  Bryce isn't that. He's a complimentary player, that's it.  When the defense and STs are on point, he plays loose and it shows.  When we are in a dog fight and things haven't gone our way, he struggles.  It's that simple. He's not a horrible QB, but he's not top tier either.  So the question begs, is this worthy of a second contract?  The answer should be no.  It definitely is my answer. Bryce will never be a QB that can produce wins largely on his arm.  That's a FRANCHISE QB, any other QB is simply a placeholder at the starter's position until that guy can be found.   At some point the excuses of lack of weapons will be a straw man.  Heck, it's nearly there now.  I mean if he doesn't look even better than last year will we blame it on the TE position?  'Well if Bryce only had a player like Kelce, Kittle or Gronk on this team...'  Are we really going to do that?  
    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
×
×
  • Create New...