Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is Ed Dickson really better than Scott Simonson?


B.BERSIN

Recommended Posts

Ed was looking pretty good last week. If he were our first string TE he wouldn't be much to praise or complain about, he'd be probably middle of the pack. But let's face it, there aren't many TEs who compare well up against Greg Olsen. Ed's good and he has a lot of experience in our system.

Simonson might be good, but he apparently needs more work. Moving him down to the practice squad is a good move. TE just isn't a place of worry for us right now. We're pretty blessed there.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I look at them both as JAG right now. Simonson is unproven, and likely needs the practice to before he's actually prepared to be a pro. Dickson, though below average for a TE1, probably falls in line with most of the other TE2s in the league. Given that Dickson has the experience over a youngster who really hasn't proven to be anything special, he logically gets the nod.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, ludwig51 said:

Simonson sucks he has done nothing Ed shown some flashes

Shown some flashes? I like dickson but he is older and on the tail end of his career most likely. I know you're new but try to go against the grain and have some sense and reasoning when you comment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Dickson is lackluster overall, but Simonson has done nothing and shown nothing.

Regarding replacing Dickson: the answer is not on the roster.

The only TE that did show something (Lucas) was cut because we value strong blockers (Such as Mike Tolbert.......)

Seems like we could have worked with Lucas. Just another thing I don't get.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • At this point, I think Chubba is the odd man out. I hate that, but I think Dowdle gives us more production and big play ability.  But there is still a lot of football to play.  I think it depends on how much Dowdle will want too.
    • I’ve been anti-trade when it comes to Melo, but the way this season has started, it may be time.  I love his game and he’s a cool dude, but I’m starting to think, if he’s your best player, you’re never going to win anything of significance.  Too many brain farts, too many injuries, and ultimately for as fun and entertaining as he is to watch - his game is indeed a thing of beauty - it just doesn’t translate to wins.  And that’s IF he even plays.  I think it’s time to cash out and maximize the return.  I love Melo, but I think it’s pretty clear what the ceiling is for a team where he is the best player.
    • Every NFL team, college program, hell even HS has numerous "what ifs" that got derailed by injury. It's a brutal sport and half the battle is just getting lucky enough to stay healthy. Doesn't matter how durable you are and how well you take care of your body everyone is one weird hit or awkward twist away from a career derailing injury.
×
×
  • Create New...