Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

The National Media is so lazy


MGH1989

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, MGH1989 said:

Was watching a clip of Colin Cowherds First Take rip off show and he said the Panthers 2015 schedule was "riddled with rookie QB's" I went back and counted, we played two.

Cowherd also said yesterday there were 15 QBs he would take over Cam- including Garropolo who has played a whopping two games 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, SOJA said:

Cowherd also said yesterday there were 15 QBs he would take over Cam- including Garropolo who has played a whopping two games 

Heard about that on the Mac Attack this morning. Unfortunately we are living in a society where the media is concentrated on delivering hot takes to get a poo ton of clicks and views.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's not just him, Dan Lebatard(who i actually like) said our schedule last year was easier because we were coming off a non playoff year and that we haven't had any injuries this year. Playing with a back up LT, C, and RT is just as bad as you can get. 

Thats why i feel bad for Dak because he's going to have a mighty tumble from all the hype he gets behind that offensive line. That line makes an mvp candidate out of everyone.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...