Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Enough with the "let's tank the rest of the season" talk


stankowalski

Recommended Posts

How anyone can consciously root for their team to lose is beyond me.  Their rationale is to get better draft picks.  But I can name plenty of top 10 picks that don't pan out, and plenty of lower round picks that do.  The key is to have a GM and scouting dept. that can do their job and if they do then in the end it doesn't matter where you pick as long as you get value in those picks.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, stankowalski said:

How anyone can consciously root for their team to lose is beyond me.  Their rationale is to get better draft picks.  But I can name plenty of top 10 picks that don't pan out, and plenty of lower round picks that do.  The key is to have a GM and scouting dept. that can do their job and if they do then in the end it doesn't matter where you pick as long as you get value in those picks.   

 

You are completely forgetting about tanking to get coaches fired. 

I would gladly sacrifice one season if it meant Shula was fired and we 1) got a good - elite OC and 2) got a high draft pick

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PrimeTimeHeel said:

You are completely forgetting about tanking to get coaches fired. 

I would gladly sacrifice one season if it meant Shula was fired and we 1) got a good - elite OC and 2) got a high draft pick

 

Shouldn't call yourself a fan .....shame on you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If by some grace of God Myles Garrett fell to us, I'd more than happily lose the rest of the games this season. 

 

This team is too injured and hamstrung by poor coaching to win out so why go 7-9 when going 4-12 means we get basically 5 players in 3 rounds when you count an early 4th and Norman's compensatory pick. Imagine a blue chip prospect like Fornette, Garrett, Peppers or Adams in a Panthers uniform.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with this. I know we aren't going anywhere in the post season and we will be lucky to make it through this season with 6 wins but I do not like the "let's tank for a high draft pick" talk. It's a loser mentality and who wants to root for a team who starts intentionally losing for draft picks? I would hope our guys have more pride than that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just want a top ten draft pick, that will definitely help and this team can reload at various positions that need an upgrade. Mainly the O-line and DE position. This season is lost anyway, what's the point of winning out now when you don't have jack to show for it? You ain't making the playoffs, and you sure as hell ain't helping yourself in draft position by winning. Hate to say it but I don't think that this team will need any fan hoping they lose, they will do that themselves. The IR moves pretty much seals the deal for a top ten pick. That line will not be sufficient as it was with Kalil. This last loss may have deflated the team to be honest. If they win  2 more games I will be surprised.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shula and Ron are going to be here regardless of our record. Gettleman knows who screwed up and knows that injuries have decimated this team. You can't make wholesale adjustments and tweak the unit's scheme with a revolving door of new players each week. You can only innovate to the level of the weakest link because their breakdowns and mistakes impact everyone else on the team. We keep having to keep things basic because we have new folks every week at key positions like center and in the secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
    • adamantium? adam? adam thielen super bowl game winning catch ?
×
×
  • Create New...