Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Can't wait for Gettlemens end of the year presser.


chknwing

Recommended Posts

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, truthjuice said:

Missed opportunities?

wait, that's Ron's line. 

I don't think he will answer any of the questions straightforward or without basically pointing the finger back to the coaches and players. He's not gonna hold himself accountable. 

he might he completly flip flopped his drafting BPA strategy to drafting for need with 3 CB's.  Who knows what he will do.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, chknwing said:

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

 

IMG_0579.GIF

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He might comment how we struggled in the beginning of the year, but now the secondary is showing up and paying off.

He'll comment on the fact that there are issues that need to be addressed. He'll probably even admit that going in with rookies in the secondary was going to be a rough ride.

 He won't say much, and just let his work speak for itself. If he drafts well, and scavenges free agency well (he won't need to spend all that much tbh), then we got a superbowl competitive team next season.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Promethean Forerunner said:

- The secondary was inexperienced, not awful. The defensive line was awful (outside Star and Addison). Our rookies didn't stand much of a chance. Since Game 1 however, Bradberry has proven that he is a stud in the making and Worley is a fine #2. 

- Thin OL? We lost Kalil, Gino, Oher, and Williams in a short span. Whenever you lose a starter and his back up, that's not a depth issue. That's just bad fugging luck. Grow up you whiny bitches.

- No, we weren't desperate for a DE. We figured that Johnson was just injured all last season and Ealy would blossom into an elite DE due to his performance last season on limited snaps.

 

If our secondary was bad then there are no words to describe the play of the offense, including QB.

*interception Carolina has the ball at the 15(goes backwards and kicks a FG)* -damn that secondary.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, chknwing said:

I hope we get his presser soon.  Its gonna be fun to see our local reporters try to beat him into dust over the clusterfug that was the 2016 season.  What do you think his responses will be to these statements?

You removed Normans franchise tag and drafted 3 CB's.  And the secondary was awful.

You rolled the dice on a very thin offensive line and Cam paid the price for it. 

As desperate as this team was in need for a DE you drafted a DT that hardly played.

Hillarious if you think this media is going to ask anything controversial. It took them over a week to ask Ron about the Rams job. Person and Newton aren't capable of putting a coherent controversial sentence together and Voth is more concerned about getting his one on one interview with Gettleman every year than ruffling any feathers.

I do not think he was anything great, but the Charlotte media took a huge hit when it lost Jones. At least he was intelligent and could ask questions. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- The secondary was inexperienced, not awful. The defensive line was awful (outside Star and Addison). Our rookies didn't stand much of a chance. Since Game 1 however, Bradberry has proven that he is a stud in the making and Worley is a fine #2. 

- Thin OL? We lost Kalil, Gino, Oher, and Williams in a short span. Whenever you lose a starter and his back up, that's not a depth issue. That's just bad fugging luck. Grow up you whiny bitches.

- No, we weren't desperate for a DE. We figured that Johnson was just injured all last season and Ealy would blossom into an elite DE due to his performance last season on limited snaps.

 



Leading the league in sacks hardly constitutes an awful defensive line

Sent from my SM-N920V using CarolinaHuddle mobile app

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Give me Mitchell Evans over T Sanders in this run heavy offense any day of the week. 
    • What's up gents, the OGs remember me, the guy who single-handedly gave the Panthers the greatest uniform in history moniker. Not too long after that I got involved with Pro Football Focus (pre-Collinsworth acquisition) and ended up taking backseat here to preserve some objectivity. But from a distance I noticed a lot. After the end of the Cam era this place devolved into the most un-fun, petty, negative cesspool of whining and bitching that has ever graced the internet. The worst part of it all is that the level of discussion turned into the most ill-informed, hot-take, unnuanced crap, rife with people talking out of their posteriors as if they have any clue about what they are watching. Once you get into the professional side of the sport and actual film rooms, you start to understand there's an absurd number of moving parts to pretty much every snap and the details you are privy to are truly only half the picture. The absolute most important thing I learned from being part of professional level football analysis is that quarterbacking is literally the most intricate and difficult position in all of professional sports, and that the NFL itself is struggling to develop any workable model that allows them to understand what makes one succeed vs what makes one fail. Because of this paradox it has also made the quarterback position itself grossly overvalued from a fan and media standpoint, creating an absurd fixation on the results delivered by a single player who has to rely on the contributions of everyone around them. This also drives the dreaded inflation of QB salaries that inevitably cause even elite teams to lose key talent all to pour cash into the one player supposed to be able to single-handedly elevate the entire team (and defense and special teams and coaching and ownership by some mysterious proxy), yet without those same players even talented teams can wander the wilderness searching for the right guy to take advantage of their talent window. The discussions the last few years around Bryce has personified this insanity, as this board has devolved into some sort of electronic civil war between the hyperbolic Young supporters and the vitriolic Bryce haters. The reality, like practically everything in this world, is somewhere in the middle. He has traits that can absolutely elevate a team with creativity, play recognition, off-arm angle throws, mental toughness, etc. He's also physically limited, with mostly "good-enough" qualities for most situations that a professional quarterback is asked to do, and will never be an overpowering physical force like pre-injury Cam. But "good-enough" physicality represents a large majority of championship-winning quarterbacks, even in the modern era. There's a reason the corpse of Peyton Manning took the chip from elite physical specimen Cam, because the team surrounding him was talented enough to get him there, while we all know Cam was the driving force of that 2015 team. That's no knock on him, that's just how the game of football tends to work: the more complete team usually wins. The summary is this: if this team lives or dies solely on the performance of its quarterback, then it is absolutely a paper tiger even if he plays brilliantly week in and out. There are no superheroes in this sport, there are only conduits that proxy the collective efforts of much of the team around them. And no one alive can tell you how the position is played perfectly, it's all a confluence of circumstance and what unique collection of traits each player brings to the position, which can never be truly recreated season after season, even for the same player on the same team. If this place remains a raging hellscape of idiotic hot takes I will happily remove myself again and do something more productive for yet another decade, but maybe's there hope that we can all get back to the old adage, and keep pounding.
    • Really impressed how the bottom six have looked the past couple games
×
×
  • Create New...