Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

In a few hours we could be the Browns of the NFC South.


Snake

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, GoobyPls said:

 

 

Historically speaking the NFC south is far and away the worst division in the NFL. Not a single team in our division has a record over .500 

Since realignment every NFC South team has made the Superbowl and is the first division to do so.

We're the most inconsistent division, but you can't argue we do represent pretty well certain years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, KSpan said:

7 years as Falcons coach. 4 playoff chokes in 5 seasons before 2 terrible seasons got him fired. Smith's regular-season win percentage is .589 compared to Rivera's .569 and Rivera has made a Super Bowl. Smith went to the playoffs 4 of his first 5 years while Rivera is 3 of 5, but Rivera made it further.

Also again, I'm not saying anything about Carolina - far as I'm concerned Rivera's on his last chance and I really wasn't against a change this offseason. I'm pointing out that since Smith had to flop badly 2 more times after those 4 chokes your assertion that Atlanta is some bastion of accountability doesn't hold water. By the Atlanta standard Rivera has at least this year, Year 7, to get back on track. But keep trying.

Smith also had a retard as a GM and produced. Like worse than Hurney retard. If one thing is good in Carolina its the GM but that's about it. The Falcons owner was at least able to notice he was not up to snuff as well unlike JR who keeps mediocrity around him at all times. What we all know but want say is that no matter how poor our team will do the next 3 years Rivera and Shula will still be here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, dardarroarroar said:


Jesus Christ ... somebody get this man a shot of something emoji123.pngstrongemoji123.png how many we all complain but this is ridiculous our season is over the only thing we can do is look forward to the next and honestly there have been low points that are lower than this so you need not complain because if I remember correctly we went one season one and 15 if we are going to zero and 15 and we are going one and 15 we are a step ahead... that's not excuse the mediocrity but you know what I mean


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle

I have no idea what you just said, but no back to back winning seasons in 22 seasons and no SB wins is mediocre. We may be a little better than the Browns and other bad teams, but we are not as good as others. We are middle of the pack. That's the definition of mediocre.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, KillerKat said:

I have no idea what you just said, but no back to back winning seasons in 22 seasons and no SB wins is mediocre. We may be a little better than the Browns and other bad teams, but we are not as good as others. We are middle of the pack. That's the definition of mediocre.

According to SB stats we are the bungals. Guess that's better... Sad part is we should be 2-0 in the SB. I really think we would have rolled in 2014 as well. Our owner is weak though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

Since realignment every NFC South team has made the Superbowl and is the first division to do so.

We're the most inconsistent division, but you can't argue we do represent pretty well certain years.

That's why I said historically, we have the lowest winning % of all divisions 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been around 30 fuging years longer than we have.  It took them 50 years to reach 2 SB's, it took us 20.  Yeah I don't want to be the only team in the division without a ring but comparing us to the Browns is silly.  I'll bet you damn well we have a ring or two to show for by our 50th year

Hell, I think we'll have one by our 25th

Link to comment
Share on other sites

They've been around 30 fuging years longer than we have.  It took them 50 years to reach 2 SB's, it took us 20.  Yeah I don't want to be the only team in the division without a ring but comparing us to the Browns is silly.  I'll bet you damn well we have a ring or two to show for by our 50th year

Hell, I think we'll have one by our 25th


This this this. .. honestly this is how I sleep at night because it took all these teams all these years to get Lumbardy's they had 30 to 20 years to get these trophies so I say we're doing pretty good I just wish we could've been a team with one


Sent from my iPhone using CarolinaHuddle
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, considering that we just finished our 21rst season and  the Falcons/Saints had a 30 year head start and the Bucaneers had a 20 year head start...I think we're a bit ahead of schedule.  2 super bowl runs in 21 years as well as more division championships than anyone else...I think we're doing alright.  The Browns have gone to the playoffs 1 time since we've been a franchise...it's apples and oranges. Heck, it took the Falcons 50 years to do what we did in 20...and yes I'm saying that because they are not going to win tonight.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Right...I think they've done really well. No one's going to bat 1000% but they've addressed areas of need and there's no comparison to the overall talent of the team now than when DC and then Morgan got the reigns. This whole season is about seeing how much of a step up can Bryce and this team make. If Bryce can't and last year is as good as it gets for him then at least we have a talented roster for the next guy. I think we're going to be good this season 
    • I said could, not would. I recognize he has potential based on past performance. Compared to what KP has done, Howell has more potential and the physical traits to make noise. KP has small hands and a weak arm. Not something you want in even your backup QB.  I've been hammering since last off-season before we re-signed Dalton, improve the room. Other than getting younger, I don't see how anyone can say we legitimately improved the room or even tried. We might as well have signed Josh Rosen.  Dalton is still on the roster for now. That's 3 QBs unless we trade or cut him. He's still Bryce's mentor after all. Do you believe we are going to draft someone with potential and give them a legitimate opportunity to develop from the practice squad? Are we going to carry 3 QBs on the active roster? 4 for a developmental rookie? Are we going to potentially cut KP if we draft a rookie and he's outperformed? Doubtful. Cutting Dalton(if we can't trade him) and KP would be 8m in wasted cap space.  I chose Howell as an example because he showed promise in his only full season as a starter. You could plug in another name with the physical traits and potential and what i said would still apply. KP showed almost nothing and was benched. I genuinely don't care if it’s rookie pick as long as there is the potential to develop into a future NFL QB.  As much as I can't stand him, Bellichek was always developing a number 2 QB even with the GOAT as his starter. The wisdom of that was evident when Cassell came in when Brady was hurt week 1 and went 11-5 and almost made the wildcard, which 11-5 gets you almost any other year. I give credit where it's due though. Cassel and Jimmy G both came into the league as developmental QBs, potential QB1s, and went on to have careers.  You never know if you never try. KP feels like a punt in addressing the most important position on the field. Bryce has never played 2 full games of franchise QB level football back to back.  If Bryce progresses, are you ready to offer a 280m 5 year extension based off a one hit wonder year? If Bryce regresses and we need a QB in 27, are we going to trade a fortune away again to trade up to 1 to get one? Are you ready to do the past 3 years all over again?  To me, it's not about Kenny Pickett. It's about the move itself. It was a feeble attempt to improve the QB room. We better hope Bryce succeeds, because if he doesn't, we literally have no backup plan right now.   
    • IOL that early isn’t good value at all. We have a LT who might not ever be good again and a RT that might retire soon. T seems deep early in this draft, so I’d go there in the 1st. 
×
×
  • Create New...