Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Eating Alex Mack's lunch


Salisburysean98

Recommended Posts

This thread is about the D line, with everyone talking about signing Eric Berry to a long term deal as if it's the answer then those of you need to riddle me this. What if the Carolina Panthers went into 2017 with the mindset of saying to the other teams, "If you can block KK and Star then good job, but what about that big, strong, nasty dude named BRANDON WILLIAMS? Yes... The Carolina Panthers, if they signed this dude they would not only have a helluva rotation with Star, Short, AND big Vern. They could let Star comfortably walk next year without having to pay him like a pass rusher if Star is going to command just 10-15 mil under what his counterpart Short wants, which is still a big IF. And get a guy that does the same thing. Star has more sacks in the same amount of years but Williams didn't play his Rookie season much at all and has more Tackles, also he is a heck of a presence on the D line. Especially vs the run, what do you guys think? Does it have a real chance of fappening? Or is it just in my Fapination.  (Imagination)?

It would be nearly impossible for Charles Johnson and Addison NOT to break 12-15 sacks with a rotation like that a piece. Hell, I think we could come close to that nasty 2013 defense.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Salisburysean98 said:

This thread is about the D line, with everyone talking about signing Eric Berry to a long term deal as if it's the answer then those of you need to riddle me this. What if the Carolina Panthers went into 2017 with the mindset of saying to the other teams, "If you can block KK and Star then good job, but what about that big, strong, nasty dude named BRANDON WILLIAMS? Yes... The Carolina Panthers, if they signed this dude they would not only have a helluva rotation with Star, Short, AND big Vern. They could let Star comfortably walk next year without having to pay him like a pass rusher if Star is going to command just 10-15 mil under what his counterpart Short wants, which is still a big IF. And get a guy that does the same thing. Star has more sacks in the same amount of years but Williams didn't play his Rookie season much at all and has more Tackles, also he is a heck of a presence on the D line. Especially vs the run, what do you guys think? Does it have a real chance of fappening? Or is it just in my Fapination.  (Imagination)?

It would be nearly impossible for Charles Johnson and Addison NOT to break 12-15 sacks with a rotation like that a piece. Hell, I think we could come close to that nasty 2013 defense.

Star is under rated and would make the entire LB corp. worse if he leaves. IMO he  will be extended, but we may draft a NT in lower rounds to help with the rotation. 

Nick James 

There are certain guys you never let go especially with the identity of the team &  playing style.

2 thing are certain for Panthers to win the SB, stopping the run & running the ball.

KK / Star

Trai / Norwell 

@Kakarot

@Jeremy Igo

@Hoenheim

@KB_fan

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Salisburysean98 said:

This thread is about the D line, with everyone talking about signing Eric Berry to a long term deal as if it's the answer then those of you need to riddle me this. What if the Carolina Panthers went into 2017 with the mindset of saying to the other teams, "If you can block KK and Star then good job, but what about that big, strong, nasty dude named BRANDON WILLIAMS? Yes... The Carolina Panthers, if they signed this dude they would not only have a helluva rotation with Star, Short, AND big Vern. They could let Star comfortably walk next year without having to pay him like a pass rusher if Star is going to command just 10-15 mil under what his counterpart Short wants, which is still a big IF. And get a guy that does the same thing. Star has more sacks in the same amount of years but Williams didn't play his Rookie season much at all and has more Tackles, also he is a heck of a presence on the D line. Especially vs the run, what do you guys think? Does it have a real chance of fappening? Or is it just in my Fapination.  (Imagination)?

It would be nearly impossible for Charles Johnson and Addison NOT to break 12-15 sacks with a rotation like that a piece. Hell, I think we could come close to that nasty 2013 defense.

Holy poo. 

 

Too many newbs. Too many newbs. I miss the ole' days 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • In another post, Snow says about three years before you can properly grade a rookie class.  Sounds about right…
    • And this reiterates why I don’t want a Young contract extension. Please let us find another QB. 
    • Oh, the high expectations after a draft. Keep your expectations low, people. Darin Gantt's latest "Ask The Old Guy" gives life to one of those lessons about pro football reality as a fan: "Rasheed Walker was a three-year starter at left tackle for the Packers, so Freeling is going to have to work. Hunter's got another big 'un in front of him in Bobby Brown III and a different kind of defensive tackle in Tershawn Wharton. Chris Brazzell II's got a lot of traffic at his position. Zakee Wheatley has to be better than the chronically underappreciated Nick Scott, and Sam Hecht is a fifth-round rookie at the hardest position on the line to play, who probably doesn't have immediate positional flexibility, and a solid free agent addition in Luke Fortner in front of him. "Fans generally love their draft class as soon as it arrives, because there is no evidence to the contrary yet. Once guys get on the field, the reality begins to creep in, and the seasoned among you remember that if you get three or four good players out of a draft, that was an amazing draft." https://www.panthers.com/news/ask-the-old-guy-things-looking-up-after-the-draft-monroe-freeling-luke-kuechly-bryce-young-derrick-brown Don't get crazy. Winning the draft (or the offseason BTW) on paper always leads to good feelings and great expectations, especially when you seemingly succeeded the season before, but let's remember that the Panthers are very much a work in progress. Team building takes time. If we get a couple of starters out of the draft, it's a good draft, but three or four would be an amazing draft, and anything more than that is actually sensational--even if entails a few multiple high end rotational players along with three starters. Moreover, kind of within that same vein, the coaches have to let the kids off the chain. Remember the coach-speak of past coaches about competition that is anything but because coaches have their notions about veteran experience? Not saying that they're necessarily wrong, but sometimes I think their reluctance to put the young guys out there is based somewhat in dogma or possibly fear because big stakes are on the line (e.g., their jobs). It can be frustrating to say the least, but the coaches are supposed to know best. Again, I say all of this so that we can remember to temper expectations and keep them within the realm of reality. It's like telling your mind to think of it as something akin to under-promising and over-delivering. Leave room to be pleasantly surprised for the best case scenario, but be cognizant that that rarely happens. I would think at this point, most of us should be able to recognize growth when we see it, and sometimes that growth doesn't manifest itself in the form of immediate supremacy, but a setting of the stage for long term dominance for years to come. It seems like we're on track for an emergence by 2028 or 2029. We still have huge questions, but by 2029, hopefully we will take our seat at the table of the perennial contenders in the NFL.  
×
×
  • Create New...