Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Norwell hired Rosenhaus


t96

Recommended Posts

45 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I can't recall us ever having issues with a Rosenhaus client. With that said, if Norwell wants Trai money, we should probably make alternative plans. Can't afford two huge money OGs.

That's because old Hurn gave him what he wanted.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, LinvilleGorge said:

I can't recall us ever having issues with a Rosenhaus client. With that said, if Norwell wants Trai money, we should probably make alternative plans. Can't afford two huge money OGs.

Agree.  Ironically Ohio State and LSU have OG's projected in the 2-3rd round in the 2018 draft.  I hope we can get something worked out but won't be easy and we must be smart.  I also still want to keep Star, and plug other holes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Getting him for 9M/yr would have been fair and probably reasonable enough to pay, even with paying Trai that much. But I don't see how he gets anything less than 10M/yr at least on the open market. Only way to get him at a reasonable rate would be to sign him before the season. Sets Norwell up for life before he plays another game and risks injury. He has another solid to very good year and he could top , Trai on the open market.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Getting him for 9M/yr would have been fair and probably reasonable enough to pay, even with paying Trai that much. But I don't see how he gets anything less than 10M/yr at least on the open market. Only way to get him at a reasonable rate would be to sign him before the season. Sets Norwell up for life before he plays another game and risks injury. He has another solid to very good year and he could top , Trai on the open market.  

That would be reasonable if it weren't for...you know...Hurney.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Captain Morgan said:

interesting how this plays out.  Our time to win is now, but are set pretty well for the future.  We're going to need some draft picks to perform to manage our cap.  That said, I love the Great White Buffalo, and I hope he stays with us, but I understand the money angle.

GMan handed us a straight flush for the present and future.  But you're right, we either have to be lucky or good picking at the end of every round now.  No 4th rounder, no comp pick, and no tradable asset without sacrificing critical talent or depth.  Yet critical holes must be filled going forward.

For the love of Pete Marty, be smart and do not get fleeced.  Norwell is great and fair is fair for the right price, but guards can be found if not.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think Dave touches the defense. That might be a mark against him but definitely a huge red flag for evero. He refuses to run anything other than soft zone and when you don't get pressure that's an awful scheme
    • You don't have to convince me. I think not picking up the option should absolutely be firmly on the table but I just do not see Tepper and Morgan doing that for previously stated reasons. Therefore I'm not going to bother entertaining the notion. Just hoping we actually get real viable competition. If that doesn't happen at the minimum then my perception of that is complete and utter professional malpractice.
    • It was absolutely a catch, and I can’t believe how many folks were stating, before the NFL’s apology, that the overturn was the right call.  The ultimate question in this case is this: can a player complete a catch with only one hand? Of course, we all know the answer to that question, and it is an emphatic “Yes.” T-Mac maintained complete control with one hand (believe it was the right) while the other came off when the ball hit the ground. The ball was in the same position in the one hand (watch T-Mac’s fingers in relation to the NFL shield on the ball) after touching the ground as it was when it first went to the ground. Going back to the question above, if one hand can establish control, then there was no need for the other to stay on the ball, so long as the ball doesn’t move in that one hand that stays on it   It blew my mind that they overturned this in the first place. This should not be a “We got it wrong on the replay because there wasn’t clear and convincing evidence.” This should have been, “That was absolutely a catch.”
×
×
  • Create New...