Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Worley Regressed?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I didn't see the game yesterday, but I downloaded it and was watching it last night before I fell asleep (long ass day)

Worley had not 1, but 2 pass interference calls in the 1st QUARTER. I fell asleep right after so I didn't finish, but did he play better? I'm going to guess no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be regression to me, I was asking for him to get benched seemed like he did briefly things went ok but he's a target to me. I've been saying if he played in NE we would have lost he would have been picked on consistently. Just how I see it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe my recollection is faulty about yesterday but, early in the game, when we weren't getting a lot of pass rush, Worley was awful and was being "picked on".

But later in the game, when the DL was getting consistent pressure, all of a sudden you no longer heard Worley's name that much.  Was that because he was out with injury (I do remember him picking up a knock... did he ever come back in afterward?)?  Or because the pass rush always improves the secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Happy they won convincingly instead of letting them hang around. Montreal is cooked, and rather than play hockey, they've decided to take some really cheap shots at guys. I get a player may feel a need to set the tone, and I understand how that works. But to 2-hand cross check someone intentionally in the face, to have a guy down on the ice and put his head into the ice with a stick, to just start punching anyone who gets within arm's reach- that's not setting the tone. That is nothing short of playing dirty.  That said, the Canes.... oh boy. They could have run this score to 6-0 with half a power play. It's embarrassing how bad the PP is. If the Canes go to the Cup finals against a team who scores at least 1 goal per game on the PP, they'll lose the close games because of the lack of results on the PP. 
    • Because he knows they are winning the cup. And I fully support his decision. 
    • After Brindamour figured out how to stop that stupid behind the net offense setup Montreal did in Game 1 they’ve been dead to rights. They don’t have an answer and the series is over. I hope Canes fans relentlessly torment Carter Hart about being a rapist so we can win our second cup 
×
×
  • Create New...