Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Has Worley Regressed?


beastson

Recommended Posts

I didn't see the game yesterday, but I downloaded it and was watching it last night before I fell asleep (long ass day)

Worley had not 1, but 2 pass interference calls in the 1st QUARTER. I fell asleep right after so I didn't finish, but did he play better? I'm going to guess no

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Seems to be regression to me, I was asking for him to get benched seemed like he did briefly things went ok but he's a target to me. I've been saying if he played in NE we would have lost he would have been picked on consistently. Just how I see it 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Maybe my recollection is faulty about yesterday but, early in the game, when we weren't getting a lot of pass rush, Worley was awful and was being "picked on".

But later in the game, when the DL was getting consistent pressure, all of a sudden you no longer heard Worley's name that much.  Was that because he was out with injury (I do remember him picking up a knock... did he ever come back in afterward?)?  Or because the pass rush always improves the secondary?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think the book has been fairly written on Darnold, and by and large stays true. He can be rattled by pressure, and will lose his composure. If a team can get to him and have something go wrong in the plan, the mistakes and errors will pile up. Rams have a better offense, Seahawks sport a better defense. Should be a good 1.
    • Not a defense of him...an understanding of the problem. (something you seem to be lacking right now) 🙄 Bryce in a Canales offense is not an example of a stylistic mismatch, but I can give you one if that helps. When he was playing for the Panthers, Cam Newton sat under OC's running Coryell type offenses. Newton had a big arm and was a strong runner. He fit into that sort of attack very well. Then he goes to New England, where at the time they were running an Earhardt-Perkins system (similar to WCO In a lot of what they do but very different terminology). The Patriot offenses back then were heavily based on timing and rhythm style passing, not something that Newton was especially well suited for. So he washed out at New England, not because he had poor ability (his abilities had been on display here on a regular basis) but because he didn't fit what they wanted to do with their offense. I always go back to Jeff Garcia as one of the prime examples of this issue. Garcia in a WCO looked like a world beater. Put him in any other scheme though...yikes!  So again, Young's issues here have nothing to do with any failure to mesh with Canales. Hell, is say Canales has actually done pretty well at adapting his system to who he has rather than trying to jam square pegs into round holes. Again, it doesn't take an elite level of football knowledge to get this. It's pretty basic. But if you're not even capable of understanding what the real problem is, how are you going to know you to find the right solution? 🤔
×
×
  • Create New...