Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carolina Top Receivers


iBBB

Carolina Top Receivers  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Which one of the receiving players will be the first to Hit 1000+ receiving yards ?

    • Christian McCaffrey
      9
    • Devin Funchess
      51
    • Kelvin Benjamin
      47
    • Other
      0
    • Ed Dickson
      2
    • None
      13


Recommended Posts

Here is the Receiving Statistic through 5 games

    Rec Yds Y/Rec TD
C McCaffrey   27 237 8.8 1
D Funchess   24 269 11.2 3
K Benjamin   17 272 16 1
Ed Dickson   11 271 24.6 0
R Shepard   6 87 14.5 1
J Stewart   6 44 7.3 1
C Samuel   4 12 3 0
F Whittaker   3 34 11.3 1
G Olsen   3 28 9.3 0

 

Pace for 2017 season

    Rec Yds
C McCaffrey   86.4 758.4
D Funchess   76.8 860.8
K Benjamin   54.4 870.4
Ed Dickson   35.2 867.2
       

 

Obviously Dickson's stats are inflated due to Olsen being out, so it's between Fun Fun, Benji and CMC. Even though right now, none of them are projected to get to 1000+ yards, my gut feeling says Fun Fun's production will increase and he will be the first

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ideally Bryce and the other starters should get at least a full quarter and an argument could be made for 2 full quarters given how they've played early in the season the last few years.
    • A rookie that has never played a snap and a proven 1000K NFL WR are not going to be viewed the same in these type rankings.  And calling draft picks, lotto picks, isn't some new quip I just invented.  take the big 3 Hubbard, AT, insert whatever 3rd Panther you want vs Kamara, Hill, Olave.  Most football folks outside of Carolina are picking the Saints there IMO.    
    • You didn’t really address the point, just like you ignored the point about the RBs initially, and saying “they are all lotto picks” is just a really silly reduction because you could say that about literally any player rookie or vet every snap, every game, every year. It is well known that different positions have different hit rates, and I would argue different types of prospects within position groups as well, and that hit rates change the further down in the draft you go. Everybody knows QB is different and that, for example, first round OL have a really high success rate. Using your lotto ticket analogy…again…you are saying a lotto ticket with a 1 in 100 chance of hitting is the exact same thing as a lotto ticket with a 1 in 2 chance of hitting (this is an example, don’t take these odds literally). The point was he is no more of a lotto ticket than the 31yr old receiver coming off a major knee injury, and in my opinion he is better odds with a higher potential “jackpot”. Saying one player is an “lotto ticket” while another isn’t is just not sound logic. You have no idea who will break out, regress, get injured, etc. There are safer bets than others, that’s all. I don’t think Diggs is a safe bet and even if he was, weighing him over all of the Panthers WRs plus 2 1k rushers is just dumb. You can disagree if you want. The list is stupid.
×
×
  • Create New...