Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

"No one could run behind our line"


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

8 hours ago, Farachlombardi said:

It's the line not Shula man . Shula ain't the one missing blocks Matt kalil and Williams are . Shula gets blamed for every little thing and still works hard each week and creates a good game plan for fans that don't care about him or the good job he is doing.

Legitimately one of the funniest posts I've ever read on this site. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

Either Turner, Norwell and Kalil are extremely overrated in the huddle or our RB flat out suck.

Our o line is def overrated.  We get tossed around all day at los including turner.  Cmc and stew would run wild on a stout offense

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Jeremy Igo said:

As such, instead of saying "No one could run behind our line" I propose we use the phrase "no one could run in our scheme" as at this point it is painfully obvious the woes in the running game come down to play design, coaching, and when they are called during the game. 

That is certainly a big factor. We also saw in last weeks game, players like Funchess giving zero effort on several run plays. It seems to be a lot of issues causing the run problems, but talent isn't one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/29/2017 at 7:50 AM, Achilles said:

My only hope is that Shula figures out how to be less predictable.  The scheme is overly complicated and the play selection is often questionable.

My only hope is that Don gives him a steak house to manage and he leaves Charlotte forever.

I have to agree with your comments however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • After some of the calls last year probably won't see much of a drop off 
    • https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/48344034/nfl-begin-hiring-replacement-officials-given-state-negotiations-nfl-referees-association   Honestly fug these refs and their union. Resisting changes that would actually incentivize good performance and not seniority based systems. What a bunch of donkeys. Hope the replacements straight up take their jobs and never give them back. Sick of watching refs script games with no repercussions.
    • Donovan seems like highest risk to me. Lloyd and May have already established relationships with all these kids. There’s probably guys hitting the portal that they recruited from HS. And then there’s the possibility of transferring their own guys from their current teams. They’ve also been recruiting the HS kids for like the next 5 years already. Look at the Iowa coach who hit the ground running by transferring all his guys from his D2 program. Or going across sports to Cignetti transferring all his JMU guys year one then building off that to a national title year 2. Donovan is starting from square one having been in the NBA so long and he’s already 60. So you’re potentially punting year 1 for a guy you are just hoping to be a 10 year hire while you figure out how to actually develop your next home grown 20yr guy. That’s 1/10th of the time you have him, more or less at best. The hope would be that he would find some high level assistants who have been working the college recruiting trails already, but then are you giving up his ideal staff just to get a foothold in recruiting and transfers. Think Belichick year one was bad? Imagine how much worse it would be without Steve Belichicks transfer portal pulls. Hoping Mays or Lloyd are all they’re cracked up to be.
×
×
  • Create New...