Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Football Outsiders - A Deep Dive On The Jets Air Raid System And Why It's So Deadly


Saca312

Recommended Posts

On 11/18/2017 at 11:50 PM, csx said:

Their offense is easily below average in every category I can find.

Sca didn't say their offense was a world beater; only that the concepts can be tricky which isn't great news if you are facing them only once. The positive side of this is it should help prepare for the Saints passing attack a bit more. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Panthers coming off a bye is already reason for concern. Couple that with the blowout win from last game, sub .500 this week and a division rival next week in the Saints, it is the perfect recipe for what you would call a let-down game.

We should win, but no one should be shocked if we dont.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Definitely not a "gimme" game by any means. Panthers are superior to the Jets in pretty much every way, and should win easily. But, this is the Carolina Panthers we're talking about, and I wouldn't be shocked to see an embarrassing, inexplicable loss.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, CPcavedweller said:

Sca didn't say their offense was a world beater; only that the concepts can be tricky which isn't great news if you are facing them only once. The positive side of this is it should help prepare for the Saints passing attack a bit more. 

The title says it's "so deadly"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/19/2017 at 2:04 PM, MasterAwesome said:

Yeah but success = scheme + talent. You still need the personnel to execute whatever scheme you’re incorporating. You can have a scheme that somewhat mitigates a lack of talent, but it’s still going to limit your success. That’s why you look at the statistics (26th in passing yardage in the league) which is going to incorporate overall success and how effectively a scheme is being implemented.

 

    Except, let's say you have the #3 rushing Defense. If teams can't run against you, they will try to pass against you. Which will skew your passing yards. 

 

     But then again, who knows what will happen week to week?

 

    

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, FuFuLamePoo said:

Oh God all I had to see was "air raid" offense and I can already tell we're gonna open up a 31-10 lead, open up that prevent defense and then look fuging lost as we hold on for dear life

 

    Or...we can make them one dimensional, by stopping the run. Pin our ears back, and rush them into submission.

 

    If we get out to a 31-10 lead against the Jets. Do you really think they could come back? Against our Defense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I realize it about the expectations, but on paper, we drafted players who would have a chance to compete at positions where any could realistically step in and take the job---Freeling?  Yup.  Hunter?  Yup.  Brazzell?  Yup.  It is likely that all three see the field early and often.  Day 3:  Lee?  I see him as the #3 CB and the job is his when they are ready for him--and it is his to lose.  Hecht?  I loved him in mock research and called him the best C in the draft.  He might play a year behind Fortson or he could take the job--regardless, he is the obvious front runner for the 2027 season.  Wheatley?  I see Ransom and Moehrig as basically the same "in the box" type S.  If Wheatley can learn for a season behind Scott, he has the tools to be a serviceable FS, something this team needs.  Finally, Kuwatch seemed to be a PS pick, and he could be--but to win the 4th ILB job, he needs to beat out Bam Morris-Scott and with a 46.5 vertical (I can't do that on the triple jump) and a superior RAS rating, he looks like a special teamer and depth piece.....I forgot about Morgan's comment about giving up the 5th--probably to get ahead of Detroit.  Freeling has the athleticism and the tools to be the best OT in this draft.  The others lacked arm length or something like that--Freeling simply lacks a ton of experience. 
    • excellent points and insights.  I agree on Tepper.  I guess I worry that his questions and comments might influence the thinking of his employees, that his presence in the room might add pressure to an already stressful situation, but after watching it again, it does not appear to be like that.  Morgan was in charge.  Canales mentioned needing a center, but beyond that, he was there to serve as a consultant, more or less, if asked.  I suppose my point was this--everyone knew their roles, I did not see egos--I saw empowerment.  As for Morgan--I saw a leader that listened to others, made wise decisions, and never lost control.  I was VERY IMPRESSED with Dan Morgan. 
    • Pretty good summation, although I would caution just a bit that there might be a little of over-enhanced expectations. I do agree with the assessment on BPA. It was exceedingly clear they had a specific shopping list. Early on when there was some discussion about the tackles available, Morgan was asked if he was willing to give up a 5th to get Freeling, if it came to that. I think the only way it wasn't a left tackle with that 1st pick is if none that were valued as a 1st were still available.
×
×
  • Create New...