Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Could it be Shula's year?


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Jay Glazer is reporting that up to half the teams in the league may be looking for a new head coach next year. Lots of them are currently unsatisfied with their team performance and might be thinking a change would do some good (we'll know whether or not that pans out in about a week).

And that may be good news for Panthers offensive coordinator Mike Shula.

A lot could depend on the Panthers playoff performance, of course. But if you're thinking that an early exit would be a bad thing for him, it might actually be just the opposite..

Teams looking for a new head coach are notoriously impatient. It's a sad truth that coordinators of Super Bowl teams often find themselves on the outside looking in. The league has made adjustments for that, but all too often it's still true.

For that reason, if the Panthers were to make an early exit, it could be an advantage in that it would free up Shula to do interviews and take a job as soon as possible.

The bad news: Shula is not on the NFL's annual list of recommended candidates for head coaching positions. Steve Wilks is, but Shula's not. Still, the Shula name carries some weight, and not being on the list doesn't guarantee that you won't get a shot any more than being on the list guarantees that you will.

The current turmoil with Panthers ownership might also motivate Shula to want to leave more than he has in the past. Even for good teams, ownership change is fraught with uncertainty. Shula might see this as a good time to get out of Dodge (and he might be right, who knows?)

Pure speculation on my part: The Lions could be interesting. There's reportedly some dissatisfaction with Jim Caldwell after watching this season collapse despite a team that looked promising. Plus the Lions have an established quarterback, and for whatever fans think of him, there are some in the league who look very favorably on his work with Cam Newton. Of course, the Lions also have Jim Bob Cooter but he may want to look at opportunities somewhere else.

If this mass purge does happen, the attrition Glazer is talking  about would actually mean several good offensive coaches could be available as well. Dirk Koetter and Hue Jackson are possible, among others.

We'll know within the next few weeks, but for now the change that many have been looking for might actually be ready to happen.

We'll see.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Jay Glazer is reporting that up to half the teams in the league may be looking for a new head coach next year. Lots of them are currently unsatisfied with their team performance and might be thinking a change would do some good (we'll know whether or not that pans out in about a week).

And that may be good news for Panthers offensive coordinator Mike Shula.

A lot could depend on the Panthers playoff performance, of course. But if you're thinking that an early exit would be a bad thing for him, it might actually be just the opposite..

Teams looking for a new head coach are notoriously impatient. It's a sad truth that coordinators of Super Bowl teams often find themselves on the outside looking in. The league has made adjustments for that, but all too often it's still true.

For that reason, if the Panthers were to make an early exit, it could be an advantage in that it would free up Shula to do interviews and take a job as soon as possible.

The bad news: Shula is not on the NFL's annual list of recommended candidates for head coaching positions. Steve Wilks is, but Shula's not. Still, the Shula name carries some weight, and not being on the list doesn't guarantee that you won't get a shot any more than being on the list guarantees that you will.

The current turmoil with Panthers ownership might also motivate Shula to want to leave more than he has in the past. Even for good teams, ownership change is fraught with uncertainty. Shula might see this as a good time to get out of Dodge (and he might be right, who knows?)

Pure speculation on my part: The Lions could be interesting. There's reportedly some dissatisfaction with Jim Caldwell after watching this season collapse despite a team that looked promising. Plus the Lions have an established quarterback, and for whatever fans think of him, there are some in the league who look very favorably on his work with Cam Newton. Of course, the Lions also have Jim Bob Cooter but he may want to look at opportunities somewhere else.

If this mass purge does happen, the attrition Glazer is talking  about would actually mean several good offensive coaches could be available as well. Dirk Koetter and Hue Jackson are possible, among others.

We'll know within the next few weeks, but for now the change that many have been looking for might actually be ready to happen.

We'll see.

We can only hope.  I think Shula might be a better head coach this time around than when he was with the Bucs.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I’m not suggesting that tanking is the right thing to do every time. I do think that if you have guys like Burns and Moore that you will trade anyway, then you should think about tanking and getting max value, especially if you want to grab a QB that might go 1st overall. We tried to do both. Trade CMC for picks but don’t take 3 1sts and a 2nd for Burns and Moore. Instead, we won a few games and then threw in Moore on a trade because we didn’t tank and we gave Burns away for a 2nd. Can you honestly say that fully tanking, by trading away all our best guys who weren’t in future plans, in 2022 wouldn’t have made our team better now? We wanted a rookie QB and we didn’t extend the main guy we didn’t want to trade. We were 100% in full tear down and we could have been a playoff team last year if we used the 4 extra 1sts or 3 1sts and 2 2nds (counting picks saved on Young by being pick 3 or 4 not 9) on D. Culture building is funny. It took three coaching changes to seemingly get there. Morgan and Canales weren’t in charge when we “protected” our culture. We still traded Burns and Moore, we just lost 3 first round picks in the process. Also, do you think the Eagles are in a bad place because of their coach clearly tanking a game for a draft pick? Remember that? It was obvious and the coach was fired. The funny thing is that this is something teams do all the time but they add their stars (like Cam in 2016, CMC, Burns, etc.) to IR or rest them in week 16/17. Pederson was just dumb and made it obvious. He could have just sat his starters to start. Anyway, did that incident tank risk their credibility? Did Barkley decide to not sign with them? Seems like their SB win and other SB visit say they are just fine. Winning makes culture, picking the right coach makes culture, trading away guys who are on other teams in a year for top picks and keeping more picks by having a better starting pick to trade up, does not impact culture. If it helps you win, culture will be fine, ask the Eagles.
×
×
  • Create New...