Would you trade Daryl Williams?

[jumpman910]

Problem with that is Thomas isn't worth his contract at all. Him and Dez should not be making Julio Jones money

[panthers1234]

I thought the OL was the main reason we lost and you wanted to trade a good piece away. Cam didn't have enough time on several plays because the OL didn't hold up particularly well. 

[t96]

And replace him with another Mate Chandler? Lock him up this offseason for the next 4-5 years.

[PleaseCutStewart]

Why would we trade a young OT who did very good last year, counts almost nothing towards the cap, and hasn't even entered his prime yet? Do we really want to risk seeing a 2nd Matt Kalil at the other tackle?

[CPF4LIFE]

LOL....its took us forever to find 2 tackles that can play and we finally get one and we should trade him? 

What will they give for kail?? 

[SCO96]

If we did trade him (and I wouldn't BTW), what kind of return would you expect to get in terms of draft picks?

I'm joining this thread a little late so I don't know if my question has already been addressed.

[Bartin]

22 minutes ago, jumpman910 said:

Problem with that is Thomas isn't worth his contract at all. Him and Dez should not be making Julio Jones money

He's also 30. I'm not necessarily opposed to the idea if Moton has actually looked really good in practice, but not for an old, highly paid receiver. If it's for a young WR on a rookie deal then I might give the idea some merit though I'm not sure there are any WRs who currently fit that profile that are actually realistic. Like you're not getting a Beckham, Cooper or Evans for him.

[Untouchable]

31 minutes ago, stratopanther said:

Folks on here constantly complain about not having tackles. Now we get one and OP likes the logic behind trading him...

Contract year is next year. Can't pay everyone. Player on the roster developing behind him. Players regress all the time. Trade doesn't have to be for a WR. Sure, the logic makes sense.

[My Goodness My Guinness]

Yeah man let’s do that. We are stacked with talent at tackle.

[LinvilleGorge]

It's amazing how soon people forget the days with the likes of Byron Bell, Mike Remmers, and Nate Chandler playing OT for us. I'm not saying Williams is Lane Johnson at RT but he's leaps and bounds better than most of the guys we've trotted out at OT during the Cam era. Trading him would be really dumb. Even if Moton is legit, we need depth at OT too and M. Kalil is likely done here after next season.

[JARROD]

52 minutes ago, Shocker said:

You do know that Josh Gordon has been suspended like 10 times right.

 Joking about trading Williams,...  not about Worley.

and yes he’s been suspended 100 times but this is really it for him— so I think he’ll be alright. 

[SCO96]

46 minutes ago, Untouchable said:

Contract year is next year. Can't pay everyone. Player on the roster developing behind him. Players regress all the time. Trade doesn't have to be for a WR. Sure, the logic makes sense.

See, this is how I feel about Norwell. His contract is up and like you said, we can't pay everyone.

I'm impressed by the fact that he hasn't given up a sack this season. But, we consider ourselves a running team, and with him we rank 31st in rushing when you subtract Cam's rushing totals. All season long we've seen Stewart and CMac get stuffed on inside runs. We need to create more holes for them.

I think we can find a replacement at LG in the draft, via FA, or possibly moving Moton inside and not experience that a huge drop of a off. At the same time we could save a lot of money and sure up the other holes on the team.

[Seltzer]

I love Norwell and hope we keep him, but I agree with everyone that there is less risk in trying to replace Norwell with Moton than to get rid of Williams.

Trading Williams would be insanity