Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Is There Any Way We Could Get Earl Thomas, Richard Sherman, or Josh Norman this Offseason?


Hoenheim

Recommended Posts

Secondary was a ridiculous problem this season. Bradberry and Worely regressed horribly with the exception of the Vikings and Packers games, and our saftey play was attrocious. Somethings gotta give whether that be us signing a quality free agent and/or getting some fresh faces in from the draft, particularly at saftey. 

My thinking was we could draft a guy like Daeshon Elliot (S from Texas) , Justin Ried (from Stanford) , or Ronnie Harrison (from Bama) , or a litany of other safteys this 2018 draft in round 2-4. \

Then maybe we could get a really good free agent or trade for a great secondary player?  I know these guys I mentioned in the title  are not scheduled to be free agents in 2018 ,  but could we possibly trade for one of them or possibility one gets cut? I'm not very informed on how these things work. Seattle looks like they are ready to impload and I can imagine they could be getting rid of 1 or 2 of their marquee defenders just to make more space and help out the oline/offensive talent more. 

I was curious after people were mentioning that we could trade for Josh Gordon. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would take Thomas or Josh back in a heartbeat if they hit the market. No to Sherman. I think it's already set to happen that Josh will return here. Just a matter of when--and unfortunately, it sounds like it won't be this offseason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

40 minutes ago, theballboy said:

Kenny Vaccaro and Carlton Davis, Joshua Jackson or Denzel Ward would take this defense to another level. 

Man, as much as I dislike Vacaro, it would really stick it to the saints if we got him. His 5th year is up now right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...