Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

CJ Anderson


RumHam

Recommended Posts

Looks like he's done in Denver. Would it be worth giving a 4th or 5th and cutting stew to bring him in? Someone proven and a RB down there won't have an immediate impact.

 

Anderson closed out the Broncos' disappointing 2017 as one of the bright spots with his first career 1,000-yard rushing season, but he was openly wondering what his future would be immediately following the season finale. Anderson's contract is structured in such a way the Broncos could release him, with two years remaining on the deal, without any "dead money'' charge against the salary cap. The team also seems intent on getting Devontae Booker into the No. 1 role. Coach Vance Joseph, somewhat surprisingly to many with the team and in the league, fired assistant head coach/running backs coach Eric Studesville after the 5-11 finish, a move Anderson was particularly critical of on social media. Add it all up and Anderson appears to be headed elsewhere. If that's the case, the Dolphins will have interest given the Broncos matched Miami's deal two years ago to keep Anderson. -- Jeff Legwold

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He's actually scheduled to make less than Stew. His contract isn't out of line with his production at all. Hell, he probably wants to get cut because he could probably get more money elsewhere. Right now there's no guaranteed money at all in his contract. I think he just fell out of favor with the coaching staff and they have a younger RB who isn't as good that for some reason they think is the answer. Anderson has never averaged under 4ypc in his career. Booker has never averaged over 3.8ypc. I think the donkeys are making a mistake here if they jettison Anderson and his reasonable contract for Booker.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Why does everyone want to give up a like a 4th round draft pick ( which we don't have) for just an average or ok running back.  Half this board is draft these 20 guys and we are in the super bowl, the other half is give away all our picks for these guys and we will be in the super bowl.  You can get these kinds of guys at the end of March for 2 or 3 million a year and not give up anything.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, bababoey said:

Why does everyone want to give up a like a 4th round draft pick ( which we don't have) for just an average or ok running back.  Half this board is draft these 20 guys and we are in the super bowl, the other half is give away all our picks for these guys and we will be in the super bowl.  You can get these kinds of guys at the end of March for 2 or 3 million a year and not give up anything.

because people like the idea of projects while others are looking for the impact now. window is closing. need something now and there's other needs elsewhere to address in the draft. by the logic of drafting a running back after the third round we did that already, with Payne, who's on the roster. I mean we can roll with him? Or we get someone proven to give us 2-3 seasons as 27 isn't 30. JStew at 27 was a beast. Anderson would fit us well considering he'd split time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Cards weren't really blitzing that much the entire game.  The ones they sent just wrecked Bryce.  My opinion is you are over fixated on what happened as we got close to the goal.   The one possession we had in the 3rd quarter? That was a freebie to get down there.  It was literally just checkdowns to the TE when we weren't running the ball down... 24 taking up the entire quarter.  Next quarter Cards were inviting the exact same behavior.  Which is why they were both clock eating small ball 14 play drives. 
    • I don't think they changed as much as you think between the INT and the final sack (immediate pressure with 4 linemen). They definitely stopped blitzing as much, if a blitz means rushing more than the front 4/5. They definitely did some exotic packages where they sent LBs/DBs and dropped linemen into coverage though. The fumble and INT were both blitzes. And yes they were successful. And yes, I agreed with Bryce not taking care of the ball. Really not many answers on those plays - just take the sack and live another play (unless you're Lamar). Which he didn't do. And no, you can't run prevent on the goal line. What's prevent defense to you? Alignment, personnel, cushion, etc.? Just curious. My reply was to the post that they sat back in some soft zone the whole game - until the end, when it mattered. That's not true. They blitzed, they disguised coverages and blitzers, they pressed, they bailed, they covered the flats, all of that. Not trying to argue. Just trying to inform. Actually they only blitzed once on the final drive, and the DB got away with a bad hold on Tremayne. Otherwise looked like it would have been a completion for a first down. The Cardinals' final drive defense looked a lot like the rest of the game.  I know it's easy to get upset after a lose (I'm guilty), but Mondays are when cooler heads prevail. Right? Emotions can make us seem like we don't know what we're talking about. The Huddle isn't supposed to be that. I always saw it as a place to go discuss the Carolina Panthers with more than the casual fan, and their emotionally charged opinions. I can get that at the local grocery store, where they don't know anything about NC/SC, let alone the Panthers. 
    • Poor guy went from the Ravens to this disaster
×
×
  • Create New...