Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers meet with Sony Michel


Jeremy Igo

Recommended Posts

Just now, saX man said:

Combine meetings aren’t always “ah we like you taffy duck step lads”

We may be drilling in at their acumen, football IQ and treating it like an interview.

Yep. Combine has become quite a spectacle over the years. In reality, it doesn't tell us much of anything. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Yep. Combine has become quite a spectacle over the years. In reality, it doesn't tell us much of anything. 

I usually have my eye and gut test checking in late December/early Jan with the college year still well in memory. The guys who really stand out leading their teams are the ones to keep an eye on through the process. 

I do like the crop of defenders in this draft. Curious about that UVA safety.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, bewonee said:

god no. we don't need another speed back. get scar or another late round power guy.

Sony is a complete back. I’d rather not pick him at 24, it’s what it would take, but if there is no stud (WR-Ridley, OT-McGlinchey, DT-Key, or S-James)who do you pick? It’s tough to pick Ronnie Harrison, who I like or Christian Kirk or Will Hernandez with Michel on the board

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Jeremy Igo said:

Yep. Combine has become quite a spectacle over the years. In reality, it doesn't tell us much of anything. 

tbh - it is ALL bad data to build your team off of..

 

more teams have been hurt by falling in love with 'X' player at the combine

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I don't think working from memory is going to be very productive or useful. You would need to compare them all, which is far easier to do from the breakdowns of each game. That has tiered charts that give real data.  But, even then that wouldn't substitute for a trained eye(s) doing detailed film analysis to attempt to determine if we are modifying the offense dramatically for Bryce.
    • I think front office and general team culture under new ownership is sort of on the right track. The rookies all look incredible compared to where you'd expect each one of them to be right now. Lee's in game coaching is awful, he might be ok as a culture and developmental guy but that can't outweigh the in-game miscues and bad game plans. If LaMelo can't figure out the ankles then I think you gotta trade him for a haul, can't keep having your seasons lost every year because he can't stay on the court. And I say that as a big fan of him. Miller I think is unlucky, he looks likely to be an elite core player for us, but if he can't put together a stretch of healthy seasons he would trend towards LaMelo and need to be moved. I used to like Miles on the court a lot more but nowadays he's just an empty stat guy who needs to go. The short lived hot start to the season was fun but unless LaMelo and Miller both get and stay healthy within the next few weeks I can't even see us being a play-in team this year. And even if they do get healthy, we're probably looking at play-in at best, maybe barely compete for that fringe 6th seed. 
×
×
  • Create New...