Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Rule Proposal: Review Office could eject players


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Sweets said:

A bad idea among other bad ideas I am sure they are cooking up.  have they worked out what a catch is?  because that should be the only thing they need to be working on right now.   

Might be just me,

 

And I don’t consider myself to be a football genius by any standard, but the catch rule seems pretty clear and fair to me.

i think most of the outrage this past year over that rule was from certain announcers and players with their panties all in a wad because their favorite player or team missed an opportunity, and they needed something to lash out against. I don’t recall seeing any catch or non catch that was called that really stood out as being incorrect.

someone juggles the ball out of the end zone it should not be a TD...

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, chknwing said:

bad idea.  it would take focus off reviewing the play.  teams would throw challenge flags just to get officials to possibly eject another player.

devil's advocate: Burfict twisting ankles, refs didn't see it, but it was obvious on replay. Eject his ass!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • One thing I didn’t consider is how thin this draft is at quarterback. That’s going to drive up the market for backups and borderline starters like Willis, Jones, and Jameis Winston. Because of that, we’ll most likely be priced out of the market for this tier of backup. 
    • We've already beat the #1 seed twice, why not one more? (Packers and Rams were both #1 seed at the time we played)
    • My determination has come down to this. Based on recent QB history, has Bryce's improvement warranted 50m per season? Lamar is the only original team QB to play on his 5th year. The others took major deals at the end of the 3rd, before or just after the option was signed. Chances are, we're getting asked for the same.  I haven't rooted for Bryce to fail. I've rooted for him to succeed so big that them signing that extension would give me no worries about our future at QB at all. We haven't seen that level of play consistently that this year. We haven't seen it in the past 6 games.  We're about to be at a threshold with Bryce and I worry about what this front office will do. We have a history of bad decision making and Morgan has been part of that group making those decisions. I don't want Carolina in the same boat Arizona and Miami are right now. It has nothing to with being right. It has to do with wanting to win for more than a single season. We've never had back to back winning seasons. Faith in their abilities is not warranted at this point. 
×
×
  • Create New...