Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hypothetical: CMAC & CMUEL Backfield?


Isaac

Recommended Posts

With J. Wright being signed as a slot option, is it possible we might see a tandem backfield with Christian and Curtis?  Curtis had a dual threat career at Ohio State, so maybe Norv sees these two being a dynamic duo, with CAP being the between the tackles bruiser?  Thoughts?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got railed for posting this two weeks ago, but some good points were made.

Samuel will not be an RB for us - maybe a gadget type but never an RB.

1. He weighs less than 200 lbs

2. Durability has already become a concern

3. He can't run up the middle, so the defenses already know what his role would be.

4. Can you imagine Samuel pass blocking a LB or DL if its a play action? '

5. CMC is already really good at it, why take away from him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Isaac said:

With J. Wright being signed as a slot option, is it possible we might see a tandem backfield with Christian and Curtis?  Curtis had a dual threat career at Ohio State, so maybe Norv sees these two being a dynamic duo, with CAP being the between the tackles bruiser?  Thoughts?

I’m actually fine with this. I think in order to get the best and the most out of Curtis is to use him like KC uses Tyrek Hill. Don’t get me wrong, I’m not saying they are the same player because Tyrek Hill is a very unique player developing into a dangerous WR. But at Ohio State Curtis was able to run the ball and be used as a primary deep threat. He should be allowed to do the same here it makes our offense that much more special. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'd love to see some reverses or the wildcat using the both of them but Samuel's injury killed any chance of them being used like Stew and Deangelo. That's fine though CMC isn't a traditional back either. Play to their strengths and make them both gadget players IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel can be used for end arounds, screens, catches out of the backfield, pitches, and maybe even an outside toss.   I mean that is the type player he is....he most definitely can be used in the backfield some.    He obviously isn't an inbetween the tackle runner.   Obviously you can't use him consistently in the backfield but it can happen.  I mean he was that in college and NFL teams use WRs that way when skilled. 

But we are talking random plays, not offensive norms. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Samuel isn't a RB and I doubt you'll ever see him in the backfield alone.  Maybe you can use both he and CMC at times together, but there's absolutely no comparison to Stew/DWilly.  None.  I am very interested to see how Norv plans to use CMC.  I think he's good enough to play as a lead back, but I worry about his size.  He actually comps pretty well athletically to another star RB that Norv had in SD, but he's 20 lbs lighter.  I was pretty strong in my day, but I could do more than 10 reps at 225 as a Sr in HS and I weighed 30 lbs less than he did.

Samuel was brought in to basically be Tyreek Hill.  

Basically, I think we still need a lead back unless the staff suddenly shows trust in CAP.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Isaac said:

With J. Wright being signed as a slot option, is it possible we might see a tandem backfield with Christian and Curtis?  Curtis had a dual threat career at Ohio State, so maybe Norv sees these two being a dynamic duo, with CAP being the between the tackles bruiser?  Thoughts?

CAP isn't a bruiser lol. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...