Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Dez Bryant


ncfan

Dez Bryant  

122 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you pick him up?

    • Yes
      35
    • No
      89


Recommended Posts

19 minutes ago, tiger7_88 said:

You think Dez Bryant is gonna sign somewhere for 2-3 million?

Or do you think we have a lot more money left over under the cap than we actually have?

Oh! Oh!  I know!  You're one of those that think that established veterans are eager to sign "prove it" deals, aintcha?

You do realize Dez is pretty much done. His only positive is he can 50/50 a ball in the red zone. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

33 minutes ago, rayzor said:

overrated at this point. level of skill and production is on the downside.

also overpriced in this market. ain't no way he'd be worth the going rate.

Dez was falling off two years ago. Pretty much a shell of himself now. If he's looking for a playoff team he might take a cheap deal. Otherwise I really doubt many teams will give him much more than 5k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dez is terrible.  Last thing Cam needs is slow wr that can’t separate in his ear saying GET ME UP ME BALL!!

we got rid of the last wr we had like that and the offense opened up.  Why try it again?  Cam needs guys that can stretch the field.  We already have guys that can work the underneath and actually... you know.. get open.  

Let dez ruin ruin some other team.  

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He’s kind of overrated to be honest. Never really felt like a true #1 or elevated his play to become a guy the defense really has to worry about. 
    • I'm going to be real, the reason that vote ended up so lop-sided by the end was directly due to my programming. So there's nothing tongue in cheek about it. Also I left PFF after the Collinsworth acquisition (didn't want to move to Cincy) but have stayed involved in analytics via backdoor channels, but I can absolutely say that the experience was eye-opening, not because those guys are unquestionable football savants and that I became one by proxy, but because the amount of information that becomes available outside of what the typical fan has access to is revelatory and also really drives home how much context is still being missed even with all of that information. You don't discover that you know everything, you discover how much you still can't know no matter how hard you try, hence my point about the NFL not being able to figure out what makes a QB good. There's a lot of AI work going into that now and even that only seems to further confuse things vs. actually enlighten the problem. In the professional realm teams don't really talk about quarterbacks as A strictly being better than B, but how A can potentially perform better than B given a specific context of C. Of course those contexts may be wider for A than B, but there's also contexts where B can outshine A, even with lesser talent surrounding them. So what good teams strive to do is ultimately define a process of how they want their entire team to operate under schematically, find players that fit that scheme, and hopefully find a guy whose skillset will be maximized running that scheme with those players. Where bad teams fall of the wagon is constantly shifting those schemes and chasing bad fits or fads vs. sticking with a core identity and developing it.
    • there is a 100 mile long list of NFL players and coaches going to bat and defending horrible play from teammates.   
×
×
  • Create New...