Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which is dumber: The bench press or the Wonderlic?


Recommended Posts

53 minutes ago, Khaki Lackey said:

I’ve always wondered why we don’t hear more about the QB’s velocity.

We hear about it constantly. That's why everyone said Watson couldn't play QB last year and then he went and poo all over the league.

It's also the only reason people give a crap about josh allen.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I disagree with the premise of the question. All information - strength, speed, or intellect related - offer important information. It is just that none are absolutely dispositive. I would definitely hesitate to draft a QB who scored in the low teens on the Wonderlic. This is well below average and intellect does mater - especially at the QB position. Having said that, I would not have a rule that says under NO circumstances would I draft a QB who scores well below average.

All information has value.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Marcogreenbush said:

Just curious , where did you coach ? 

Two different D-II programs and four D-I programs - as DBs coach, DC, or head.

I don't post my identity because I like to be able to speak freely and say things that might not be popular.

At least one person seems to have figured it out, though (it did not help that my teenage son registered under his real name) - and has been following me around pestering me because, I suspect, he went to a school with a rival program.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think i lurked a few years before joining in 2017. Probably during the 2015 season
    • https://nfltraderumors.co/2026-nfl-draft-grades-for-all-32-teams/      Grade: B+ Best Pick: Sam Hecht Biggest Reach (consensus rank): Jackson Kuwatch (NR) It's easy to love what Carolina did. The Panthers traded four times but ended the draft with the same number of selections that they started with and in approximately the same ranges. They did not take a player ahead of the consensus until Kuwatch at No. 227, and it's easy to see how he fell through the cracks playing at Miami of Ohio. He's a high-end athlete, though, and has a chance to develop, which is a fine profile for a seventh-rounder. Freeling and Brazzell also checked the high-end athleticism upside boxes for the Panthers. Carolina let the board come to them in the first round and could have a long-term solution at left tackle, which is a hard position to fill. Brazzell slid because of some maturity concerns as well as the difficulty in projecting receivers from Tennessee's Mickey Mouse offense. At 6-4, 200 pounds and 4.37 in the 40, though, the upside is undeniable. On top of that, the landed three starters on Day 3. Normally that's a high and unrealistic bar, but Hecht and Wheatley were both firmly inside the top 100 on the consensus board and have paths to win starting competitions. Lee fits the scheme well and has some interesting traits as an outside corner. What stopped me from a full-out A grade is not loving the Hunter pick, though he does fill a need to replace DT A'Shawn Robinson. There were prospects at other needs positions I would have been more jazzed about. The Brazzell pick is also an interesting risk for a team that's still in building mode, even coming off an NFC South title. Still, I'm nitpicking
×
×
  • Create New...