Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

How many more years do you think Rivera should get?


Cyberjag

Recommended Posts

I know we've been to the Super Bowl.  I recognize that Rivera is the most successful coach in Panthers history.  He's been here for seven seasons already, with a legitimate franchise quarterback and a perennially good defense.  Overall record is 64-47-1.  The guy he replaced was a regular Jeff Fisher, punctuating a perpetual 7-9 run with a few really good years.  Under Fox, we were always good enough to be respectable, never good enough to win it all.  Is this where we're headed with Rivera?

Of the Super Bowl winning coaches in the last 20 years, only one Super Bowl winning coach has been with a team this long who hasn't won already, Bill Cowher (who took a whopping 14 years for his big game, but won it the year after he got a legit franchise !B).  The next closest coaches all won in year five--Tony Dungy, John Harbaugh and Mike McCarthey.

Say we go 10-6 for the next 3-4 years and our core starts aging out.  Would you still have faith in Rivera to eventually deliver a title? Or do you think he should be replaced if he doesn't deliver one in X years?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He should be here for the long run as much as you all bitch. Unless he just starts bombing or gets John Fox-esque then I see no reason to look elsewhere. GM is a different story. Rivera has shown enough success that any GM would be open to working with him. However if ownership wants the identity of the team to change, that's all out the window. Steelers still have Tomlin who in honesty is god awful but a players coach. It's one thing to have a franchise QB but if you have continuity at coach that's just as important.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I hope the new owner gives him a chance to develop a team out from under JR's influence.  I'd like to see what that looks like. 

Additionally, if Rivera is let go, I hope they already have the replacement at hand and don't have to go looking for someone in semi-desperation mode.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, PantherCam213 said:

I hope the new owner gives him a chance to develop a team out from under JR's influence.  I'd like to see what that looks like.

What sort of influence do you think JR has right now?  I mean, how does it manifest?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s hard as hell to win in this league, and even harder to win a Super Bowl. Rivera is winning, and as long as he keeps winning, I’m all for him staying. Although, I want ownership to come in and get us a new GM, I’m fine with the coach. He still makes some mistakes that coaches of his tenure shouldn’t be making, but for the most part, each year he’s been here, we’ve seen growth. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We made the playoffs last year in a super tough NFC with all of our receivers getting hurt at one point and barely lost to the Saints. 

Rivera has at least 2-3 more years.  He has his flaws, but you can do way worse than him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If you look at almost all Daniels stats, they are as good or better than last year minus perhaps Completion Percentage. I don't think Daniels himself is having very much less individual success than the Redskins are reverting to the mean.  https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46003861/nfl-teams-likely-decline-lose-more-games-2025-season-predictions-vikings-chiefs-commanders-lions-colts#wsh Barnwell wrote about them in the preseason as a team that had an inordinate amount of luck or success in one score games that wasn't very likely to be repeated.
    • We thinking of the same Mike White? He probably won’t even make it off the practice squad.
    • I would heavily push back on the notion of Tomlin and Cowher inheriting "collapsed teams." From 1980 to 1991(prior to Cowher and after their Super Bowl victories) the Steelers experienced just 4 sub .500 seasons. In fact the winning percentage for those years was 0.505. At most that was relatively mediocre, something fairly akin to the pre-Tepper Panthers. From Cowher through Tomlin(1992 to Present) it has been the NFL's best franchise. 22 playoff appearances, 4 Super Bowl Appearances, 2 Titles, 15 times winning the division. In fact they have only experienced 3 sub .500 records in that 34 season span.  That isn't ever a scenario where rebuilding happens. It's constant and consistent retooling so that your franchise floor is always high. It's smart business decisions, exceptional drafting and quality personnel moves that create a situation where that floor STAYS high.  It was precisely BECAUSE we opted to go through a complete teardown and "rebuild" without any of that competence being in the organization at all that led us to where we are currently. A situation that will more than likely continue for well over a decade longer.  Long term successful franchises do not "rebuild." They are in a constant state of competent flux that sustains them through some leaner periods without ripping the foundation completely out that led to that success in the first place. 
×
×
  • Create New...