Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Move from 24 to 15

trueblade

By trueblade,
in Carolina Panthers

Recommended Posts

trueblade Grand Master

trueblade

Posted
Posted

The NFL Network did their Live Mock Draft. The particiapants were  Daniel Jeremiah (@movethesticks), Charles Davis (@cfd22). Dave Dameshek, Christa Frelund, Colleen Wolfe, Bucky Brooks (former Panthers scout), Steve Mariucci, and Maurice Jones Drew. 

In their mock, Minkah Fitzpatrick lasted until Pick 15. What would it cost the Panthers to move up from 24 to 15 get Fitzpatrick if this scenario played out on Draft night?

Here's the mock in case you missed it.

#1 Browns USC QB Sam Darnold (Jeremiah)
#2 NYG Penn State RB Saquon Barkley (Maricucci)
#3 NYJ Oklahoma QB Baker Mayfield (Davis)
#4 Browns NC State DE Bradley Chubb (Jeremiah)
#5 DEN UCLA QB Josh Rosen (Jones Drew)
#6 Colts Georgia LB Roquan Smith (Brooks)
#7 TB Florida State S Derwin James (Wolfe) - not a fan of TB getting James, ugh.
#8 CHI Notre Dame G Quenton Nelson (Frelund)
#9 49ers Virginia Tech LB Tremaine Edmunds (Mariucci)
#10 OAK Ohio State CB Denzel Ward (MJD)
#11 MAI Washington DT Vita Vea (Dameshek)
#12 Bills Wyoming QB Josh Allen (Brooks)
#13 Redskins UTEP G Will Hernandez (Frelund)
#14 GB UTSA DE Marcus Davenport.(Brooks)
#15 AZ Alabama S Minkah Fitzpatrick (Wolfe)

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, tarheelpride said:

Maybe I’m naive, but I think a 3rd can do it. If we trade up, i think it’ll be for DJ Moore. We’d have to jump Dallas to get him. 

 

That’s the only scenario I can see us trading up

That would be a steal according to the draft value chart. Teams don't like giving away steals. #24 plus one of our 3rds gets us up in the #18 range.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
panther4life Community Regular

panther4life

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That would be a steal according to the draft value chart. Teams don't like giving away steals. #24 plus one of our 3rds gets us up in the #18 range.

Yea 18 is the highest I can see us moving up. Perfect territory to go After Ridley or Moore. Cowboys picking at 19 and Patriots at 22. Both teams need a receiver and both are the only 2 teams reported to have brought them both in on a visit in addition to us.

 If we were to trade up those seem like the most likely targets and 1 of the 3rd's seems like the max compensation we'd consider parting with. I'd make the move for Ridley but I'd hold off on doing it for Moore.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
43 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Yea 18 is the highest I can see us moving up. Perfect territory to go After Ridley or Moore. Cowboys picking at 19 and Patriots at 22. Both teams need a receiver and both are the only 2 teams reported to have brought them both in on a visit in addition to us.

 If we were to trade up those seem like the most likely targets and 1 of the 3rd's seems like the max compensation we'd consider parting with. I'd make the move for Ridley but I'd hold off on doing it for Moore.

 

Yep. That would make sense and a move like that wouldn't shock me.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      We joke about how the NFL has a script for the season. But maybe it's not a joke?

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • rayzor
      Our guys working their azz's off to be the winners they know they are!!

      By rayzor · Posted

      Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Rocky Davis
      NHL Draft 2025

      By Rocky Davis · Posted

      Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...