Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

2017 offense's pace under Rivera/Shula


tiger7_88

Recommended Posts

The following piece is not my own and is from an article on a site that will not link in this forum.  It is based upon Football Outsider's Pace Stats at this link: https://www.footballoutsiders.com/stats/pacestats

 

Quote

 

According to Football Outsiders’ pace statistics, the Carolina Panthers ran the league’s slowest offense in 2017. The 29.35 seconds they averaged between plays was over a second and a half longer than the league average.

There are two numbers that stand out in this chart- the Panthers’ pace in the second half and their pace when trailing by at least a touchdown. The Panthers are the slowest team in the league in both of these circumstances.

The slow pace of the second half coincides with the Panthers’ difficulty holding on to late leads. The two are probably unrelated, but the combination of a team playing at a very slow pace while surrendering their lead is enough to drive fans mad and call into question the team’s sense of urgency.

The Panthers took 2.68 seconds longer than the average team to run a play when trailing by at least a touchdown, which may partially explain why the Panthers went 3-6 (including playoffs) in games during which they trailed by a touchdown at any point during the game. The latest touchdown deficit the Panthers overcame was a 10-3 deficit with 13:32 left in the 2nd quarter against the Lions. I don’t have information on the rest of the league to compare that to, but it doesn’t seem great.

With Norv Turner taking over offensive coordinator duties, it’s assured we’ll see different things from the Panthers offense next season. However, whether or not the team adjusts its pace remains to be seen. Mike Shula could have been under orders from Ron Rivera to use as much clock as possible with each play call, which jibes with Rivera’s frequent emphasis on the importance of controlling the clock and winning time of possession. But from a fan’s perspective, it’d be nice to see the Panthers play with more pace and a better perceived sense of urgency.

 

Head Coach Ron Rivera... No urgency to score points since 2011.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I bet Cam walked up to the line of scrimmage with fewer than ten seconds left on the play clock more than any qb in the league the last few years. It's almost like our coaching staff didn't want him doing any presnap reads. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rhyslloyd said:

But, but, but everyone keeps telling me what a great coach Rivera is.  Shula only had a job because of Rivera's incompetence.  

This seemingly prevalent viewpoint needs to get stopped for good.  Not that Shula was a poor OC, he was.  But that Rivera is not a good coach.

We have a coach who is a two time AP coach of the year!  Do you know what the list of people with that accomplishment looks like?  Here, let me help you:  Allie Sherman, Don Shula, George Allen, Chuck Knox, Joe Gibbs, Bill Parcells, Bill Belichick, Dan Reeves, Tony Dungy, Bruce Arians.  And Ron Rivera.  That's a pretty strong list.  And every single one of those guys had / has flaws.

Every coach has flaws and blind spots.  RR's are pretty apparent:  A strong preference for veteran players and a belief in his subordinate coaches.  That doesn't mean he's a bad coach, it's simply a flaw.  Nobody is perfect.

I assure you that should we fire RR, he will have job offers at the very first opportunity.  There are many teams who would love to have RR as their head coach.

Oh, and just to put a final nail in this coffin . . . the best five year period in team history?  2011 to 2015.  Under RR.

Please.  Just stop with RR hate.  He's an imperfect but incredibly good coach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, BrianS said:

This seemingly prevalent viewpoint needs to get stopped for good.  Not that Shula was a poor OC, he was.  But that Rivera is not a good coach.

We have a coach who is a two time AP coach of the year!  Do you know what the list of people with that accomplishment looks like?  Here, let me help you:  Allie Sherman, Don Shula, George Allen, Chuck Knox, Joe Gibbs, Bill Parcells, Bill Belichick, Dan Reeves, Tony Dungy, Bruce Arians.  And Ron Rivera.  That's a pretty strong list.  And every single one of those guys had / has flaws.

Every coach has flaws and blind spots.  RR's are pretty apparent:  A strong preference for veteran players and a belief in his subordinate coaches.  That doesn't mean he's a bad coach, it's simply a flaw.  Nobody is perfect.

I assure you that should we fire RR, he will have job offers at the very first opportunity.  There are many teams who would love to have RR as their head coach.

Oh, and just to put a final nail in this coffin . . . the best five year period in team history?  2011 to 2015.  Under RR.

Please.  Just stop with RR hate.  He's an imperfect but incredibly good coach.

Two words:  Cam Newton. Cam has made Rivera's career.  He's the same lame duck he always has been.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Combination of the fact that Shula had no concept of situational awareness and the fact that Cam takes forever in between plays (whether he’s on his back after a sack, celebrating a first down, or taking a knee to call the play in the huddle)  

Running hurry up offense and giving Cam freedom at the line to change the play would eliminate Cams tendency, however it would come at the cost of our incredibly old defense going back on the field too soon. 

I don’t mind the fact that we play slow to keep our defense rested. I just want better plays called from our coordinator (ie, stop sending two receivers to the same area). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If your focus is on the defensive side of the ball then it makes sense to reduce urgency between plays. It eats time off of the clock and shortens the game. It also allows the defense to rest.

My problem is not so much with the time between plays, but with the predictability of the Panthers' playcalling. How much of that predictability occurred because of Shula and the limits of his system and how much is because of Rivera's defensive focus, his focus on time of possession, and his fear of turnovers remains a bit of a mystery.

BTW, one other factor that greatly impacts on early down playcalling is the accuracy of your QB. An incomplete pass stops the clock and tends to make you more predictable on 3rd down due to more third and long calls. This also greatly increases the risk of turnovers.

Finding the right balance would appear to be the key to sustained success. Here is to hoping that balance shows itself in the new system.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

That has nothing to do with Shula and everything to do with Rivera. He has stated in the past he doesn’t believe in fast pace no huddle offense. He would rather the offense struggle than his defense. I don’t think Norv is s fast pace offensive coach either btw

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Playing to win vs. Playin not to lose.

 

Ron is of an era where you ran the ball, controlled the clock, and asked your QB not to lose it for you.  And that's all fine and well, unless you have a Cam Newton under center.  Then you need to attack.

I don't know exactly what happened to our offense since 2015, but something drastic changed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rivera's philosophy derives itself from an archaic form of football back in his days of the '85 Bears. The days where "ground and pound" was the norm, enabling a focus on the defense. With that background, Rivera seeks to forcefully implement such philosophy in the modern day NFL, as his mentality focuses on defense despite whether the offense maintains talent or not.

Considering such, it's a damn shame when one analyzes the potential for the Panthers offense. Cam Newton is a bonafide star whose ability as a pocket passer and runner would make any competent offensive-minded coach drool with imagination of endless possibilities. A fast-paced, no-huddle modernized offense with Cam Newton as the lead with the 2018 roster likely would lead to significant points being scored and a juggernaut the NFL may have no answer to. However, Rivera has shown time and time again he likes to keep a leash on such potential due to his stubborn grounding upon obsolete football principles that fail in today's NFL.

Hopefully Norv has control over Rivera and implements a better modernized offense maximizing Cam's potential. However, this is unlikely, and it's a shame.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Quoted rom one of the many Bryce threads... Wanted to reply to this, but since my answer turned into a go route (i.e. went long) I thought I'd put it in a separate thread. So here's my take on the names mentioned above (and others) ... Lance was a prototypical "take an athlete and teach him to play quarterback" example who now serves as an example of why that's a bad idea. Worth remembering that Lance was given to a coach heralded as a QB guru with a friendly system. In the end though, even that potentially ideal situation wasn't enough. And the fact those events were followed up by said guru taking his team to the Super Bowl with a QB who went undrafted helps bolster the folly.of that approach. But then you have Wilson, an actual quarterback with off the charts passing skill. This guy's sure to succeed, right? Well...wrong, which demonstrates that even the right skill set doesn't guarantee success.  Could Wilson have succeeded in a better situation under better coaching? Unknown, but it's a question I find myself asking a lot. (See also: Levis, Will) Rosen falls into the Ryan Leaf / Ryan Mallet category, i.e. don't hand the keys to your billion dollar franchise over to a dickhead. Character matters, and not strictly in the 'upright citizen vs thuggish criminal ' way. (I could add maybe don't draft guys with the first name 'Ryan' unless they went to Harvard, and even then only in the 7th round) Darnold is another guy who likely could have benefited from a better situation / coaching (see also Carr: David). Heck, it also might have helped to send him to The Wizard and have him ask for "da noiv", or perhaps to Egon Spengler and company to chase away any and all "ghosts". Sending him to Matt Rhule? 😬 Yeah...definitely not the answer 😕 But hey, at least he's doing better now. (ttill playoff time, anyway) Mind you, Drew Brees does serve as proof that guys who land in less than ideal - or just flat out lousy - situations early on can indeed resurrect their careers later on in better surroundings. Will Darnold go that far? Unknown, but we do know it's possible. Kenny Pickett (also known by the X-Men moniker 'Littlehand') is that proverbial great college quarterback who for one reason or another just doesn't cut it in the pros.  (gotta say, feels like the past several drafts have put forth a lot of that particular QB archetype) Mac Jones could arguably carry this label as well, though I'm waiting to see how things play out in San Francisco. For now, Jones might be a better example of why you should always be cautious and skeptical of guys from certain systems. Justin Fields is a cell in that spreadsheet column, as is Kyler Murray. Now I'm sure someone here will mention another certain quarterback we're all quite familiar with as a prime example of this subset too 😐 Fair point, though I think he, Murray and Tagovailoa work better under the heading of "Davids". What's a David? It's a guy you send to battle against a "Goliath". And by all means, bet on that guy if he's a shepherd.  If he's a quarterback, though? 🤔 Root for him, encourage him, appreciate his courage and be inspired by him... ...but don't draft him. The return on investment might be a great story, but it's not likely to be one that involves championships and rings. ... Bottom Line? You've no doubt heard this saying "this ain't rocket science".  Well, I'd argue saying "this ain't quarterback evaluation" might truly make a better negative metaphorical comparison. At least with rocket science, it's science. You're working with things that have some level of consistency, even predictability. Stuff like chemistry, physics, metallurgy, etc. Human beings?  Specifically young male athletes with massive amounts of ego and testosterone who've been heavily catered to a lot of their lives and have now been handed large sums money and a portal to fame... Yeah, good luck with thatb😖 Heck, you might get better odds buying a Powerball ticket, or perhaps playing a roulette wheel at a Vegas casino. (gambling involves risk; please play responsibility. for help with gambling addiction call the Gambling Hotline at 1-800-522-4700)
    • The sad part is Williams led the league in rushing tds as well with like 18 and didn't even make the pro bowl that season.  Too bad it all ended in Jake's epic collapse 
    • Yeah. He talked about using him that way and I forget the term. Maybe nickel LB? Ike have to watch it again.    If you look at the video it is maybe 2/3 through where talks about him and also CSW.     
×
×
  • Create New...