Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

About that Team President job...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

If there's been a single word written about candidates, interviews or anything else related to the job, I haven't seen it.

I assume this process is still proceeding, but either it's going really slowly or they're being really secretive.

(Be vewy quiet...I'm hunting executives)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, mjligon said:

This clickbaity thread title ranks up there with some of Igo’s best in All-Pro.

Not meant to be.

I'd originally planned to just title the thread "Team President" but I thought that would give the impression that I had news when I don't. Hence, why I chose this title instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Tepper strikes me as a purposeful individual.  He probably has a short list but doesn’t want to rush as it may seem like too much too soon.  I suspect change will be deliberate albeit subtle.  I would think the job functions can and is being done by other individuals within the org.  

He needs to assess the specific things his pres need to do and clearly delineate because I suspect the lines are blurred now.  Nothing worse than a new guy/girl coming in with the perception that he is encroaching on someone else’s turf.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Not meant to be.

I'd originally planned to just title the thread "Team President" but I thought that would give the impression that I had news when I don't. Hence, why I chose this title instead.

It’s worth a discussion anyway.

But I couldn’t resist; seeing the use of ellipsis in thread title reminds me of some All-Pro purpose driven clickbait threads.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm thinking that whomever he has his eye on is already employed with another team and that team isn't willing to give them up just yet.

That's a possibility.

Voth reported some weeks back that he had two candidates in mind, but we never heard who they were or much of anything about them.

And of course, if the were unattached, there'd be no barriers to delay their hiring.

Who knows?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • With Freddie Slavin and Svech both playing at MVP levels, no one can touch us. Burns playing well.  Imagine if Jarvy and Aho get going…
    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
×
×
  • Create New...