Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

We are retaining 7 LB and only 4 CB in today’s nfl?


GoobyPls

Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, GoobyPls said:

This obsession with linebackers makes no sense, last year we got destroyed every time we played our base 4-3. The majority of the nfl played nickel 70% of the time and even dime defense is starting to catch on more than the 4-3.

 

 

For once I agree with you. I don’t think we are done yet.  I think Smith is going to PS. We just were high on him and didn’t think he would clear waivers so we are trying to slide him over later. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Andre Smith was kept solely to hold a place until we bring in someone else from cuts or after week 1. He'll be waived after that and then hopefully clear waivers and signed to the PS.

And before you ask, yes, they figured Doss would be much more likely to clear waivers than Smith this weekend. If you were evaluating cuts by the Panthers, which position group would you consider to be stronger?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, GoobyPls said:

This obsession with linebackers makes no sense, last year we got destroyed every time we played our base 4-3. The majority of the nfl played nickel 70% of the time and even dime defense is starting to catch on more than the 4-3.

 

 

Or the LB corp got better in coverage ..ex  Shaq’s INTs in preseason 

You put the best players on the field. 

1 hour ago, Black&BlueBubba said:

For once I agree with you. I don’t think we are done yet.  I think Smith is going to PS. We just were high on him and didn’t think he would clear waivers so we are trying to slide him over later. 

Yea that’s why 70% of the league went 11-5?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think they kept Smith to see him a little longer as he was injured for most of the preseason and with TD suspended, why not. They will pick up another CB (Doss or someone else) after someone becomes available or they IR somebody with the designation to bring them back. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...