Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Player out for season while trying to take in account QB bullpoo


RumHam

Recommended Posts

Whatever benefits offense right? Dolphins William Hayes attempted to ease up on sacking the shitty David Carr and in turn planted wrong and tore his ACL. BTW, we won't ever see Cam get any of these calls, esp since he was drilled and that player received a fine that was equivalent to the same fine given for a taunt. 

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/24782945/william-hayes-miami-dolphins-tears-acl-trying-avoid-sack-flag

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Bartin said:

I laugh that it was because of Packers fans whining about Rodgers getting injured that the rule exists in the first place and they are the ones getting screwed the most.

Haha, it's definitely true.  Trying to keep the game as safe as possible, I understand, but.....this new rule change is about as soft as it gets.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Eazy-E said:

Just take advantage of the rule. If you’re in a 3rd and long situation just tell the offensive line not to block. A defender will have a free shot on your QB but it’s a guaranteed 15 yards and a first down.

I know you are being funny but then why not just do that every play? Reason is that with an open lane to the qb the defense would be able to make a legal hit easier. The problem is when the O-line is stout or at least puts up a fight, the defense is pushing hard and fighting hard to get to the QB and the hit is less predictable, leading to the possibility of a roughing call. 

Its garbage. The qb is just another player, why should he be protected like that when RBs and linemen are getting slammed every play? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Asurfaholic said:

I know you are being funny but then why not just do that every play? Reason is that with an open lane to the qb the defense would be able to make a legal hit easier. The problem is when the O-line is stout or at least puts up a fight, the defense is pushing hard and fighting hard to get to the QB and the hit is less predictable, leading to the possibility of a roughing call. 

Its garbage. The qb is just another player, why should he be protected like that when RBs and linemen are getting slammed every play? 

Because pretty much every legit starting QB in the NFL is going to be making $20M+ per season pretty soon and the owners don't want to see those guys sitting on the sidelines. Don't pretend that the majority of the owners don't likely support these new rules protecting QBs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Because pretty much every legit starting QB in the NFL is going to be making $20M+ per season pretty soon and the owners don't want to see those guys sitting on the sidelines. Don't pretend that the majority of the owners don't likely support these new rules protecting QBs.

Ratings is a huge factor as well. Packers games which are usually near the top of the list for most highly rated games did terribly last year after Rodgers went down.

Though the injury is unrelated to this controversy, there will be a similar impact felt with the 49ers who have 5 primetime games and just lost Jimmy G for the year. No one wants to watch CJ Beathard get steamrolled.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Eazy-E said:

Just take advantage of the rule. If you’re in a 3rd and long situation just tell the offensive line not to block. A defender will have a free shot on your QB but it’s a guaranteed 15 yards and a first down.

So lemme see if I understand you...

You want to roll the dice on an entire season for one first down?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • That zone was so soft that 3 guys were bearly on the screen. No rushing called. Playing off the line 10+ yards. Yeah that's garbage time. It took an onsides kick to make them try to play D again. Until then they didn't care and still wouldn't play real D against Young until they absolutely had to and that was with backups in the backfield. Slow start is freaking hilarious. He was gifted the lowest effort a bad team can give and still couldn't put anything together for 1 freaking series at the end after 2 quarters of warmup ball. It was like watching someone stretching for an hour and then pull a hammy after 10 feet of running. 
    • On the subject of Reich and him being no good as a coach, because he wouldn’t change everything he did to accommodate Young. He wanted to sit Young. He knew what Young was.  But to the point, was Andrew Luck a good QB under Reich in Indy? Most people don’t hesitate to say yes. Well, Luck thought enough of his coaching to bring him to Stanford.  There is a bona fide NFL QB that seems to dispute the painting of Reich as a incompetent and the reason for Young’s shortcomings.  Yes he got fired. It appears as if Tepper and Fitterer forced a QB he did not want on him and poisoned the well right from the start. I don’t blame Reich one bit for being pissed either.  And I wasn’t a Reich guy I wanted Wilks. I accepted the Reich hire but never lobbied for him.  Just saying he is being dogged here unfairly.   
    • I think its a mix of both. Bryce being too small and offense is too vanilla. Plays arent creative enough. Most are slants, fades and runs. But even Baker and Sam had to deal with vanilla offense and looked horrid. Thats why I say it's a mix of both.
×
×
  • Create New...