Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anyone else bothered by this NFL Gameday Morning Commercial?


fitty76

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Toomers said:

  I was the remote control. In the turn the knob days...lol. 3 feet from TV. And you never knew what might go flying. A shush would have been like a pat on the head. 

Jesus, that sucks. Lucky for me, my Dad was a big reader. I got to watch whatever I want.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

That's what I was thinking. Most people don't like it because they don't like feeling guilty about shushing their own kids or their parents shushed them as kids. I don't judge you. I think it's perfectly fine to shush kids when you're trying to watch something. I mean, unless they're trying to tell you the house is on fire. 

You would be a type of dad that would shush your child after he/she said "I Love You" because that is what happened in the video if you would have listened to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rbsponsel52 said:

You would be a type of dad that would shush your child after he/she said "I Love You" because that is what happened in the video if you would have listened to it.

I watched the video. I heard the joke. I got the joke. I laughed. If you get your parenting cues from the NFL Network, then your kids have much bigger problems than you shushing them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, PanthersBigD said:

Jesus, that sucks. Lucky for me, my Dad was a big reader. I got to watch whatever I want.

It was great. My life was perfect and those are some great memories. That was the 70s. In Pittsburgh. This world is wayyyy too sensitive. 

  I shocked this is a discussion. It’s a over the top commercial. There’s a TV in the sky. After Michael Irvin “howled”, who in their right mind took anything else seriously? That is 2018 in a nutshell. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Rico walking is no big deal. I'll take a healthy 2024 Hubbard over Rico any time and losing Mays is, again, no a big deal.  Young is signed for what, $35M for the next two years? Say he wants $50M but the FO doesn't. If they put the franchise tag on him, that would be around $55? So basically they are getting Young for the next 3 years for an average of $30M per year. Putting the franchise tag on him wouldn't be my first choice but it gives them an option that wouldn't be locking him into a long term, $50M contract. I'm not suggestion they do that. Just that the option will be there should they get to that point. Hunt is on a 5 year deal which is done in 28 so he either restructures or is gone anyway. Moton will be 35 by then and will either be gone or have diminished playing time. Neither of those players has anything to do with getting Young a contract. The O line is way overpaid anyway. Hopefully by the time they are gone, Freeling and Hecht will be developed and Ickey will be healthy. Young was benched his second year and only got his job back because Dalton was injured. Not sure how you can call that entitled. And I would NOT say putting a rookie QB on a team with no receivers, tight ends or O lineman and then being put with a coach who never wanted you and is fired mid season, is a definition of luck. As far as competition, no team is going to bring in competition for a QB picked first overall - especially given the capital that was given up to get him.  
    • With apologies to Lady Cowboy fan, any day we can screw over the Cowboys is a GOOD day…
    • Been here since 2014ish. Good times. Its a shame Zod wont sell, it wouldnt take that much effort to get this place back into shape.
×
×
  • Create New...