Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

PFF: Panthers’ Curtis Samuel is finding his role in the NFL, deserves more touches


Ricky Spanish

Recommended Posts

So I was curious and went to look at our snap count distribution from yesterday to see what roles each guy was playing offensively by putting them all together so they equaled 100% of the snap counts for each of the 5 offensive skill player positions.

WR1 - Funchess 45/62; Samuel 17/62

WR2 - Moore 53/62; Byrd 9/62

WR3/TE2/FB/RB2/Extra OT - Wright 22/62; Manhertz 25/62; Armah 10/62; Anderson 2/62; Newhouse 3/62

TE1 - Olsen 60/62, Thomas 2/62

RB1 - McCaffrey 61/62, Anderson 1/62

So looks like Samuel is pretty much just being played as Funchess backup right now. It's not perfect since Newhouse and Armah would have shared the field so someone else would have gone off but it worked out pretty cleanly. Wouldn't mind some of those Wright snaps going to Samuel. Not sure how I would feel about taking Funchess off the field more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 11/5/2018 at 4:17 PM, Bartin said:

So I was curious and went to look at our snap count distribution from yesterday to see what roles each guy was playing offensively by putting them all together so they equaled 100% of the snap counts for each of the 5 offensive skill player positions.

WR1 - Funchess 45/62; Samuel 17/62

WR2 - Moore 53/62; Byrd 9/62

WR3/TE2/FB/RB2/Extra OT - Wright 22/62; Manhertz 25/62; Armah 10/62; Anderson 2/62; Newhouse 3/62

TE1 - Olsen 60/62, Thomas 2/62

RB1 - McCaffrey 61/62, Anderson 1/62

So looks like Samuel is pretty much just being played as Funchess backup right now. It's not perfect since Newhouse and Armah would have shared the field so someone else would have gone off but it worked out pretty cleanly. Wouldn't mind some of those Wright snaps going to Samuel. Not sure how I would feel about taking Funchess off the field more.

What I want to know is where the hell is Anderson. If nothing else, he should have been on the field during that last possession slamming into a wall of defense to run out the clock while CMC stood on the sideline celebrating a job well done.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

What I want to know is where the hell is Anderson. If nothing else, he should have been on the field during that last possession slamming into a wall of defense to run out the clock while CMC stood on the sideline celebrating a job well done.

Maybe we're actually punishing him for the Super Bowl and the trash talk. Kinda like 50 Cent buying up all of Ja Rule's records and shows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It’s  this part that’s makes him special. 

He’s also had a step or more of separation on 75.0% of his targets this season, which is tied for the ninth-highest mark among receivers with 10-plus targets on the year.

In addition to his improved route-running and ability to get open, Samuel has a proven knack for making plays after the catch and forcing missed tackles. Among the 136 receivers with at least five catches this season, Samuel ranks first in forced missed tackles per reception and 30th in yards after the catch per reception (5.50).

ive been saying since training camp that he is the quickest guy on the field.  Love what he brings. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, RumHam said:

I want everyone to notice that if you click that fuging fart fug of an article, Cam Newton's name isn't mentioned once. Samuel did catch a TD that sealed the victory on Sunday. fug them.

Ummm.   Did know if you noticed but it was an article about Curtis not Cam. 

Damn.  You would be hateful winning the lottery. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder if using him situationally is about getting him adjusted after his heart issue and time away from the team. He has earned more touches but the game plan for this game will be more of the same as last Sunday with a few new wrinkles to adjust to Pittsburgh. Didn't have time for a full installment.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...