Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panther not worried about CMC's high snap count


Johnny Rockets

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Lumps said:

Even if his touches are limited, he is still doing things like blocking.

Also, consider we rely on one guy TOO much, what happens if he is out? We aren't god of personnel and scheming like the Patriots, think it's suffice to say if CMC went down we'd be fuged.

 

    Pretty sure if you take one of the best Offensive players off of almost any team, they would probably suffer as well.

 

    Almost half our team plays almost every snap. Why are we not worried about them?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Hun_Panthers said:

This is pure genius! Run him until the tires fall off, so we don't have to show the money when the rookie contract is up... 

He's on the field for 98% or whatever, not being used for 98%. It's not the big deal everyone is making it out to be. Much of the time he's a decoy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, rayzor said:

He's n the field for 98% or whatever, not being used for 98%. It's not the big deal everyone is making it out to be. 

Also many of his actual touches are in open space, its not the typical run the RB into the ground type of thing

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mc52beast said:

For all you guys who don’t understand, CMC is only touching the ball 3 out of every 10 snaps. And even with that VERY low % he’s still putting up impressive #s

it's just TOO MUCH! Don't you understand? He's just a fragile little guy. we just can't risk him getting tackled at all...ever.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Holy poo... we have allowed the fewest goals in the playoffs, total. Including the teams that lost in the first round... lmao
    • It was nothing. It was a nice run in an easy schedule that did nothing but lose us DJ Moore and a lot more. We were 2-15 in 2023. Based on your logic, that winning finish should have been a launching point. For as much as you want to say we shouldn’t have taken a risk, you still can’t admit that the plans we tankers laid out were proven correct. There’s no revisionist history. We said we should have traded Burns to the Rams. We said we should have sold off anything not bolted down like Brown and Horn and even Icky because they were in the 5 year plan. There is no disconnect, we tried to keep winning and draft a rookie QB and we lost about 4 1st round picks of value that could have been given to the guys you think might be the right crew.
    • You’re assuming Fitt still gets fired at the same time. That’s the problem with all these hypothetical hindsight thoughts. If we had a fire sale so to speak I’m not sure the GM gets fired a year or two later due to a bad roster and bad record. Fitt went into win now mode, made it seem like we were only a QB away “we won’t drafting this high again” trading picks for vets etc and when he couldn’t show results he was fired. I’m sure this was all mentioned in his GM interviews. What’s his plan to turn us around and how quickly can he do it. Also you want last year’s CMC and Burns on our roster? At their price? Moving on from both was the right call, with Burns being the wrong time. If a team does a full roster strip down rebuild it can buy the GM more time as long as everyone is on the same page. 
×
×
  • Create New...