Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

You want to know why Moore and Samuel weren’t on the field together?


mc52beast

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

Good god, Ron is a fugging idiot.

”Too many weapons on offense is bad!” proclaimed Mo-Ron Rivera!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mc52beast said:

According to our HC who has won two COTY awards it’s because when you have them both on the field you have to figure out who is getting the ball.

 

All this time we’re thinking Samuel didn’t wear a tie or maybe he forgot to zip up and Ron saw his undies. 

You REALLY think that's the reason... You guys I tell yea... Norv has game planned differently almost every single game this year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was Person who also asked if Ron would like to get them on the field more and his response was 

“I want to see them continue to do the things they’re doing”. 

Ron is freaking killing me with this crap. There are plenty of coaches in this league who would kill for guys like Moore and Samuel and would figure out how to get them on the field AT THE SAME TIME. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Saca312 said:

On Curtis Samuel’s 11 snaps when he was out on a pass play, Cam threw it to him 7 times.

Sounds like our QB is smart enough to know who needs the ball. I’m sure he can manage two exceptional receivers playing at the same time.

poo, I hate it when Saca is right and he is! :tongue:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ron is paying for the Uber, Norv is the one actually driving. 

Do you guys seriously think Ron is on the sideline going, "hold on, hold on, get 12 out of this play, 10 is already out there".   Norv has final say on play construction, 90%+ of the game plan and 100% play calls.  That means he knows exactly who is on the field for that play.

I get (sort of) the condemnation of Ron for going for the road win,  but how long does Norv hold the halo you guys have constructed?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...