Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

coach or gm first?


AU-panther

Recommended Posts

There seems to be a lot of discussion about who would a possible new coach but isn't their a good chance a new GM would happen first?

What is the chance Tepper would keep Hurney but let go of Rivera?  Seems like if one goes they both would and then the new GM would be instrumental in hiring the next coach.

If that did happen who would be some candidates that people would like to see as GM?

I keep thinking of an old tweet by Louis Riddick:

 

I still have my doubts on how much RR and DG were on the same page.  Seems like the best organizations benefit when everyone has the same vision.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think Ron’s job depends on how we play these last three games. If we can win at home against the Aints or at least give them a game and beat the Cons I’m thinking Ron is safe for another year. I think Hurney is gone no matter what.

As far as who should be hired first, thinking a GM. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Unless Tepper is going to hire the HC, you cant let Hurney hire him if he is heading out the door as well.  I actually think Hurney will be safe, he really hasnt done anything to lose his job.  Hell, even Ron might be safe seeing there is not much better out there and the team owes him 15 million.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And its two fold from there, we knew we were going to stink next year, we knew he wasnt going to play right away and we knew the 2025 rb class was absolutely fuging loaded.  So none of it made a lick of sense
    • Here for the lively debate but don’t devolve into “you don’t know the game” stuff. ..with that PSA over, I lean more to the it was a mistake camp myself.  It wasn’t a good move. Many people reference Frazier but it is was a few guys. I thought Sainristil would have been perfect for us. Although I will say, I don’t mind taking RBs high depending on the talent. It was him being injured and his talent relative to the other RBs in his tier that makes me less than thrilled about it. 
    • If you're insinuating Bryce Young is the only player people here have been critical of we don't even need to discuss any further because folks who have actually seen the threads knows that's factually incorrect. That's the issue and where the disconnect begins. You perceive an honest assessment and basic straightforward acknowledgment that while we can like the player on a personal level ultimately the pick was a mistake given what we know now and the other prospects that were available. None of that is the personal slight you perceive it to be. Honest discussion is not doom and gloom. If someone wants to reject the reality is front of them that is certainly their prerogative. What I'm trying to tell you is you are never going to find the dialogue you seek as long as this is your basis for the framework of discussion about our team. I'm not asking you to leave. I do believe you bring legitimate value here. I'm simply offering you an alternative if you insist on rolling out this same approach when the season rolls out. Because although optimism is high right now sooner or later we might hit a bump in the road. And conversations will likely get the opposite of glowing positivity. But that's alright. That's the rollercoaster of sports fandom. We'll survive.
×
×
  • Create New...