Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will the NFL give a super bowl to an aging Cam Newton?


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

On 12/13/2018 at 12:04 PM, Hotsauce said:

Many years from now when Cam is past his prime and a couple years away from retirement, having broken tons of NFL records and a consistent track record of being a good human on the field and off the field, could you see the NFL helping Cam add a SB to his resume?  They did it for Peyton.

 

*before you give me the NFL doesn’t give Super Bowls away argument, they have tons of control over teams and game flow.  From officiating calls, to scheduling, there are both small and major ways the NFL can give teams small nudges towards winning games.

 

Thoughts?

My thoughts You are an absolute idiot. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/13/2018 at 12:11 PM, Mr. Scot said:

The NFL didn't force Ron Rivera to go in with a dumb game plan. Neither did they hold a gun to his head and tell him that he wasn't allowed to make adjustments.

they also didn't make Josh Norman drop multiple picks... he did drop a few right? I promised myself I would never watch SB 50 until we are playing in another one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, KillaCamNewton said:

Shula sucked. But despite is incompetence if Tolbert wouldnt fumble in Denver territory and Ginn doesnt pop a pass up in the air to get picked off in the red zone we still probably win. Also blame bum Gano for missing a chip shot

this is giving me PTSD.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Of course humans commit fraud and conspire to cheat.  But the problem is keeping it quiet. 

As was said earlier, the eyes that would be looking more closely at the NFL (or any professional sports league, unless you want to include WWE) are in Vegas.  How the professional sports games unfold is far more visible than the inner workings of the McDonald's Monopoly game and certainly more visible than the Libor.

Exactly how long did it take for MLB's "Black Sox scandal" to become known....in 1920?  And you think it would be more likely today?

Now if you are saying the conspiracy consisted of ensuring Mike Shula was promoted to OC knowing he would make no adjustments against a strong (or any) defense, and in fact would run the exact same offense he ran all year with no wrinkles or changes, that is easier to accept. 

While there are people who want to blame that loss on Cam Newton, that is about like blaming the 2007 mortgage collapse on the local bank mortgage representative.  It is much more likely that a good Denver defensive unit (including coaches) figured out the best way to make the Panthers offense ineffective.  That, too, is not unprecedented in Super Bowls. In fact, it has happened fairly often.

Great response.

I'd also have to point out that refs conspired against Cam Newton that year with no calls on the shots he was taking to the head. "You're not old enough to get that call" Remember that? The Cam abuse continued in the SB not to mention the many many ignored infraction the above poster mentioned. How could that all occur organically? It doesn't.

The moment you start to ignore the voice in your head or basic logic you'll be ripe for a good scamming.

I've seen too much to not believe the NFL has nothing to do with the outcome of games. Hopefully I haven't spoiled it for those who think it's totally on the up and up................................. it's not.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Hopefully I’ll know more about this tomorrow morning at this time.  I was contacted by the aliens on the UFO that they are going to beam me up.  There plan is for me to meet with Elvis, JFK, and the passengers of Malysia flight 370.  Marilyn Monroe might be there, too. I’ll bring up the subject of the Super Bowl and see what they have to say.  I should be back by this dawn tomorrow.

The thing about conspiracies, and I am neither a believer or non-believer of them in general, is they have to be small to work.  The more people involved, the more likely somebody is to spill the beans or let something slip out.  And in the age where information (good or bad) can get out with the stroke of an enter key, that makes any plot of any size almost impossible to keep quiet.

It's simple, really.

We've never actually lost a game, at least not a fair one. Anytime the other team wins, it's because the NFL is rigged or someone cheated or someone made a bad call or someone was racist or someone was something.

Hell, the Panthers have probably never lost an honest game in the history of the team.

 

 

Or maybe it's all bullsh-t and we just lost those games because the other team was better that day.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, Sgt Schultz said:

Of course humans commit fraud and conspire to cheat.  But the problem is keeping it quiet. 

As was said earlier, the eyes that would be looking more closely at the NFL (or any professional sports league, unless you want to include WWE) are in Vegas.  How the professional sports games unfold is far more visible than the inner workings of the McDonald's Monopoly game and certainly more visible than the Libor.

Exactly how long did it take for MLB's "Black Sox scandal" to become known....in 1920?  And you think it would be more likely today?

Now if you are saying the conspiracy consisted of ensuring Mike Shula was promoted to OC knowing he would make no adjustments against a strong (or any) defense, and in fact would run the exact same offense he ran all year with no wrinkles or changes, that is easier to accept. 

While there are people who want to blame that loss on Cam Newton, that is about like blaming the 2007 mortgage collapse on the local bank mortgage representative.  It is much more likely that a good Denver defensive unit (including coaches) figured out the best way to make the Panthers offense ineffective.  That, too, is not unprecedented in Super Bowls. In fact, it has happened fairly often.

Oh, and if Payton would have taken the blows Cam did the penalties would have been huge. That didn't happen. If I'm allowed to bully your guys and your guys can't bully back without a flag? That happened. 49ers playoff coronation at BofA. A 49er defensive player jumps into the backfield and casually lines back up.

That bully scenario happened in the SB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

Pretty sure the NFL has shown they hate Cam. I would probably go the opposite way and think the NFL will do everything in their power to prevent Cam from winning a super bowl.

Bullshit. The old white Illuminati would make zillions off a charismatic, young, black, beast of a QB winning super bowls. Cam is a hero to many, villain to many. If this poo was fixed Cam would be in the Super Bowl every year. Like people as boring as Brees move the needle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Damn the Tankers are already out here talking bout tanking?  
    • Looking Back at the 2021 Panthers Draft Class An NFL player's career on average is said to last just slightly over three years, and because of that, it's considered a general rule of thumb that by Year 3, a team knows what kind of professional football player a pick has developed into. While there are always exceptions to the rule, that's not the point of this topic. This is about the players who are still on the team after being picked up in the 2021 draft (or as UDFAs). Only four remain on the roster today: Jaycee Horn, Chuba Hubbard, Tommy Tremble, and Brady Christensen. Two of them signed significant contract extensions with the team (Horn, Hubbard) while the other two (Tremble, Christensen) received short-term deals that aren't cap-heavy. It's worth mentioning the conditions these guys entered the league under Matt Rhule's second year and Scott Fitterer's first. A ton of players were brought in that year, including a long snapper who didn't make the team… instead of Trey Smith, who just happens to be the Chiefs' starting guard (hey... to be fair to Thomas Fletcher, he did have a fun draft day phone call). These four survived Rhule and Reich and were seen as valuable enough under the first-year combo of Morgan and Canales to be rewarded with second deals. Jaycee Horn (Round 1, Pick 8.) Horn has all of the traits of a true CB1: elite footwork, physicality, and the ability to mirror WR1s... but his biggest challenge has been staying on the field. He's never finished an entire season, though to be fair, it's been rumored he wouldn’t have been shut down for the final two weeks of last season had the team been in playoff contention. He's got just 37 career games played over four seasons (with 15 of those coming in Morgan/Canales' Year 1). The team gambled on his production after seeing that not only can he lock down WR1s in man or match quarters, but he can also be dependable in a heavy cover-3 zone scheme like what the Panthers ran last season. With the recent free agent and draft additions made this offseason, expect Jaycee to go back to eliminating WR1s from the game rather than shutting down a third of the field like he was recently asked to do. Chuba Hubbard (Round 4, Pick 126) Originally seen as a depth pick with linear speed, Hubbard has outperformed expectations and emerged as the team's RB1 over the past couple of years. His 2023 breakout laid the foundation, but in 2024 he cemented his role as the lead back, showing much-improved vision, contact balance, and decisiveness in outside zone. He finished top-10 in missed tackles forced and yards after contact per attempt, all while holding his own in pass protection and producing on screens. Chuba doesn't have elite burst or wiggle, but he's carved out a spot as the leader and tone-setter in the run game. Not bad value for a Day 3 selection—positional value be damned. Tommy Tremble (Round 3, Pick 83) Tremble has been the kind of player every team needs but few talk about: dependable, physical, and quietly versatile. When he was drafted, he was already known for his blocking chops and has steadily improved as a receiver. He experienced his most complete season in 2024 with a 79.3% catch rate, 10.2 yards per reception, no drops, and a 108.9 passer rating when targeted. Not only that, he's been a consistent special teamer since coming into the league. He's a natural fit as a TE/FB hybrid in 12 and 13 personnel, consistently handling the dirty work in both run and pass situations. Brady Christensen (Round 3, Pick 70) BC has played all over the line both as a starter and as a back-up. We haven't seen the "short arms" come up as often as Rhule was worried about, especially against ATL and WAS where he logged over 100 snaps at center and posted his best grades of the year (76.0 OVR, 73.8 PBL, 75.8 RBLK vs. ATL; 85.2 OVR, 72.9 PBLK, 86.0 RBLK vs. WAS). While his overall pass-blocking grade (56.1) and lack of a consistent position might mean that he's the perfect OL6 rather than a long-term starter, he's been dependable when given his opportunities.
×
×
  • Create New...