Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

I made my Fantasy Championship with Cam as my QB :(


Hotsauce

Recommended Posts

I got a $1000 on the line this week and my starting QB is not playing... 

Anyone else in the same predicament?

Any advice on who I should Start?

Nic Foles (16.1pts projected) Philly VS Houston

Case Keenum (15.5pts projectedDenver AT Oakland

Derrick Carr (14.4pts projectedOakland VS Denver

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No one gives a fug.

Sorry to be an ass, fantasy football is just a pet peeve of mine. I get it that it's hugely helped the NFL's popularity, particularly when two otherwise irrelevant teams are matched up (see this weeks Panthers/Falcons game - a lot of people who couldn't otherwise care less will likely watch because they have CMC or Ryan or Julio or Kamara on their fantasy team), but goddamn I hate how it's virtually impossible to have a football conversation these days without some jackass wanting to talk about his fuging fantasy football team like anyone else gives a singe flying fug about it.

/rant off

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No one gives a fug.

Sorry to be an ass, fantasy football is just a pet peeve of mine. I get it that it's hugely helped the NFL's popularity, particularly when two otherwise irrelevant teams are matched up (see this weeks Panthers/Falcons game - a lot of people who couldn't otherwise care less will likely watch because they have CMC or Ryan or Julio or Kamara on their fantasy team), but goddamn I hate how it's virtually impossible to have a football conversation these days without some jackass wanting to talk about his fuging fantasy football team like anyone else gives a singe flying fug about it.

/rant off

So you hate talking about FF, yet you come into an obvious FF thread to complain about talking about FF

1488F0C0-8194-4402-B9D9-39AFEB08EFD7.png

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

No one gives a fug.

Sorry to be an ass, fantasy football is just a pet peeve of mine. I get it that it's hugely helped the NFL's popularity, particularly when two otherwise irrelevant teams are matched up (see this weeks Panthers/Falcons game - a lot of people who couldn't otherwise care less will likely watch because they have CMC or Ryan or Julio or Kamara on their fantasy team), but goddamn I hate how it's virtually impossible to have a football conversation these days without some jackass wanting to talk about his fuging fantasy football team like anyone else gives a singe flying fug about it.

/rant off

Here, son, show me on this football where the bad man touched you.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Hotsauce said:

I got a $1000 on the line this week and my starting QB is not playing... 

Anyone else in the same predicament?

Any advice on who I should Start?

Nic Foles (16.1pts projected) Philly VS Houston

Case Keenum (15.5pts projectedDenver AT Oakland

Derrick Carr (14.4pts projectedOakland VS Denver

Ha wow the exact scenario I’m in now. Mines 500 but still sucks to be scrambling for a QB now(Alex Smith was my backup and jimmy G before that..oh yeah). I even have the same options as you...sucks. Keenum has the best matchup but probably the least upside...I picked up both him and Carr and am going to flip a coin this weekend 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Mine is a 500 dollar winning league for top prize and I had Cam and Wentz. Rolling with Mitch T and Josh Allen while the other guy has Big Ben vs NO and Rivers vs BALT. Hoping they have bad games more than just my two new QBs chances of playing well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, Hotsauce said:

I got a $1000 on the line this week and my starting QB is not playing... 

Anyone else in the same predicament?

Any advice on who I should Start?

Nic Foles (16.1pts projected) Philly VS Houston

Case Keenum (15.5pts projectedDenver AT Oakland

Derrick Carr (14.4pts projectedOakland VS Denver

If those are you only options, I'd go with Foles. Match up wise, its a wash between him and Keenum. Over the last four weeks, Houston is giving up 25.9 fantasy points per game to opposing QBs, while Oakland is giving up 25.1. Denver is better giving up 21.7. Foles' weapons are better since Sanders went down a couple of weeks ago for Denver, and he's at home.

ESPN has Foles ranked highest at 19. Is this a 2 QB league because you'd think guys like Mayfield Trubisky, Cousins, Allen (though I wouldn't touch him this week), and Jackson might still be available.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Posts

    • That's my biggest concern with making him the 2C.  You split up the Aho Jarvis bromance that accounted for a lot of points.  If Jarvis excels as a C, it could help the team even more though.
    • The Saints being that high is the one that killed me. Chris Olave might not know his name at this point, Shaheed is coming off injury as well, so 31 year old Brandin Cooks might be your best WR...coming off a 260 yard season over 10 games. Kamara is Kamara, but didn't have 1,000 yards last year and is about to turn 30.  Toss in the fact that Taysom Hill may be the best QB on the team and I truly don't understand Barnwell's thoughts beside seeing the names "Olave" and "Kamara" and going yep, that sounds better than "Chuba" and "Thielen". 
    • Now now now, I wouldn't say there is no logic, but there's just not a lot of in-depth thought put into Barnwell's  "analysis." Now to be fair to him (and other national writers), pre-season team rankings are basically clickbait. And...Barnwell, himself, said that "there's a lot of projection here." He basically admits that he doesn't know how the hell things are going to turn out with our receiver group. He also said that "I find myself" more intrigued by Coker than Legette; that does not mean that he said that fans should be, or that Coker will even be better than Legette (regardless of ESPN's per-route-run stat). So, yeah, Barnwell said some things, but even he has to basically admit that he doesn't know how bad or good that our playmakers will be in 2025.  Overall, what Barnwell is basically thinking is that the Panthers have gotten worse at the offensive skill positions, and baked into that is that others have gotten better. That's the argument in July (meaning, please don't give this any more weight than it's due). I would personally be surprised (not shocked) if we end up worse than the Titans, Pats and Giants at least. Once you throw in the Bills, Giants, Jets, Steelers, and even the Chargers, I personally think there are several teams' skill groups that may end up ranked lower than ours by the end of 2025.  @kungfoodudeis one of my dudes, but like others he is over the tipping point. He's had enough. Seeing is believing. I will say this though: Barnwell's piece is less about logic than just good ol' opinion. And to be honest, he might as well be a Huddler throwing out sh¡t in the summer based upon nothing but good feels or bad feels.  Our offense as a whole (just like any other team's) is going to depend upon the play of the O-line and especially the QB. How you can even rank the skill positions without expressly baking those two things in the cake is beyond me. I would dare say that that's not even logical. 
×
×
  • Create New...