Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hadn't heard of this till now...


Mr. Scot

Recommended Posts

Super Bowl grounds crew painted two 'Broncos' end zones

Quote

A snafu by the grounds crew led to two Broncos end zones being painted and zero Panthers end zones.

In the photo below, you can see the mistake more clearly. The end zone at the top of the picture is faintly covered with a Broncos logo while the end zone at the bottom of the picture is more filled in.

Broncos-double-end-zone-01-28-16.jpg

Have at it, conspiracy theorists.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Witnessesd the horror of that game in-person and will never rewatch it. My last memory of that night was leaving the stadium early and the parking lot being a desolate wasteland of Panther fans as Bronco colored fireworks lit up over the stadium. Just brutal from start the finish. Denver got points on the first drive of the game and I was pissed from start to finish. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah shucks,....

had the Super Bowl already won,... gotta do it to Nationwide music,..

bought and paid for with a MasterCard,..

booked a flight out of there and a hotel at Disney World on Hotels.com 

the conspiracy calls were all made on Sprint,..

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, OnlyPantherFaninMaine said:

Witnessesd the horror of that game in-person and will never rewatch it. My last memory of that night was leaving the stadium early and the parking lot being a desolate wasteland of Panther fans as Bronco colored fireworks lit up over the stadium. Just brutal from start the finish. Denver got points on the first drive of the game and I was pissed from start to finish. 

The only time I felt good that game was when Stew scored. Everything before and after that drive sucked.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • lol, that second part is quite literally one of the dumbest things ever. Having or not having guaranteed contracts has absolutely nothing to do with how much these billionaires have to pay.  Because there is a hard cap and a minimum cap spend requirement, and teams either use their cap or roll it over to use it all the next year, so the owners have to pay the same amount of money in the end no matter what. Having fully guaranteed contracts in the NFL would only hurt salary cap management, and thus would end up screwing over the team and its fan base when teams kiss on signings as they take up cap room that is needed to improve the roster. Look at the Browns with Watson, they gave him the fully guaranteed deal and all it’s doing is sucking up massive cap space now.  If they hadn’t done that, the owner would still be paying the same amount of money each year as that cap space would still be used elsewhere. If you want to argue for fully guaranteed contracts because the players deserve it, that’s an entirely different argument and a fair one to discuss.  But anyone against fully guaranteed deals isn’t doing it to argue for the billionaire owners.
    • Start posting in threads in the other forums instead of just creating threads. No one comes over here so you aren't starting conversations.  Get your ass up to 100 posts. It's not that hard. Don't create 100 posts. Contribute to conversations. 
    • Ryabkin could be the steal of the draft, he was a Top 10 pick heading into last season and had a rough year.  Lots of GMs passed on him because of that and his workouts. Pick has really high upside and Svech should be able to translate Rod tearing his arse a new one for making dumb plays since Svech has had several years of it.  🤣😂
×
×
  • Create New...