Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Injury Report: Irvin out, Little out of protocol


Captain Morgan

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

man, I love that Burns is getting burn lol, but would really like to see Irvin and our full complement of rushers out there.

We will need Irvin down the stretch when Burns his the wall. Let him rest that hammy for now. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Was hoping Irvin would be ready to go but not a big surprise he's still out on a short week.

Glad to hear Little has cleared the protocol.

If Olsen is limited, I wish we'd just roll with Thomas. I honestly think he's the more dynamic TE at this point in their respective careers.

There is his veteran presence on the field though, and as someone else pointed out his presence in the huddle.

It's a trade-off.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

There is his veteran presence on the field though, and as someone else pointed out his presence in the huddle.

It's a trade-off.

This is true but the luxury of having Thomas is we can rest Olsen and let him heal because he does still produce on the field. He just can't stay healthy so what is the downside of letting Thomas play and getting Olsen a little extra time to not be limited when he does play?

Edit: it is a trade off but having Olsen not on the IR is also valuable which I would hope spelling him with Thomas could achieve.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Was hoping Irvin would be ready to go but not a big surprise he's still out on a short week.

Glad to hear Little has cleared the protocol.

If Olsen is limited, I wish we'd just roll with Thomas. I honestly think he's the more dynamic TE at this point in their respective careers.

There was a reason someone didn’t want to give Olsen an extension. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • agree to disagree you are entitled to that opinion even though I find the argument completely bizarre based on data. I could type out a long paragraph discussing those areas but what’s the point. I posted a screenshot that showed Bryce in a similar post snap situation with a free rusher in his face which resulted in a TD - that’s what happened on the play so I posted it. 
    • I've already addressed this notion in a previous reply. You are basing your assertion outside reality if you think Bryce would have not only been more successful but defeated the Patriots in place of Herbert. Bryce got blown off the field by that Patriots team with the highest paid OL in the league. We've seen Bryce with an OL that gave up 65 sacks and it resulted in the #1 pick. And that is not a defense of Herbert or arguing he is a great QB in any way. He has physical talent but he has been similar to Darnold early in his career in terms of his very up and down perfomances. However that does not change the fact that they have significantly less invested in the OL than the Panthers.
    • I think Tepper has been setting the stage where pending there is no miracle he wipes it all clean.  Think you already have been told that with small things like Evero staying.  Bryce is the guy next year.  OC, DC, everything stays the same.  QB room largely the same.  Nothing would really matter there.  They basically get one more shot and it goes how the schedule paired with our 27th ranked O predictably most likely goes.  Everyone out the door together.  Bryce is a bridge tier QB.  I don’t see Dave surviving where he could be bridge QB here in reality. 
×
×
  • Create New...